2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)00372-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography–electrospray mass spectrometry for the analysis of underivatized small peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…BGE solutions consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate -100 mM acetic acid dissolved in a mixture of MeCN and MeOH of varying ratios (between 10 and 90% v/v MeCN in MeOH). The increase in MeCN content induced an increase in the electroosmotic mobility up to 70% v/v MeCN, as previously published [36,37] (data not shown). For the analyte electrophoretic mobilities, two cases can be distinguished: the compounds B2, Z2, A1 and A2, which exhibited relatively constant electrophoretic mobilities throughout the MeCN volume range studied, and the compounds B1 and Z1, which were markedly influenced by the MeCN/ MeOH ratio (Fig.…”
Section: Optimisation Of Nace Separation Conditionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…BGE solutions consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate -100 mM acetic acid dissolved in a mixture of MeCN and MeOH of varying ratios (between 10 and 90% v/v MeCN in MeOH). The increase in MeCN content induced an increase in the electroosmotic mobility up to 70% v/v MeCN, as previously published [36,37] (data not shown). For the analyte electrophoretic mobilities, two cases can be distinguished: the compounds B2, Z2, A1 and A2, which exhibited relatively constant electrophoretic mobilities throughout the MeCN volume range studied, and the compounds B1 and Z1, which were markedly influenced by the MeCN/ MeOH ratio (Fig.…”
Section: Optimisation Of Nace Separation Conditionssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…To analyse the samples by LC-MS, [24] an ion-trap mass spectrometer (Bruker Esquire 3000 plus, Dalton Co., Germany) equipped with an electrospray ionization source was Derivatization procedure: 10 μL of (c) were added to solutions of 20 μL of (a) and 70 μL of (b). After 2 min, 25 μL aliquots were injected into HPLC.…”
Section: Lc-esi-ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different acidic ion-pairing agents are anticipated to create changes in the elution time patterns (the amount of shift and possibly the order) since for the same mobile phase concentration, the hydrophobicity and pKa of the ion-pairing reagent will determine the amount of electrostatic interactions available in the column (assuming that the pH of the mobile phase is determined by the concentration of the ion-pairing reagent in the column) [42,43]. Indeed, for aliphatic acidic ion-pairing reagents, the longer the side chain, the more the column will behave as a dynamic cation-exchanger.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Ion-pairing Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%