2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion mobility spectrometry and the omics: Distinguishing isomers, molecular classes and contaminant ions in complex samples

Abstract: Ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) is a widely used analytical technique providing rapid gas phase separations. IMS alone is useful, but its coupling with mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) and various front-end separation techniques has greatly increased the molecular information achievable from different omic analyses. IMS-MS analyses are specifically gaining attention for improving metabolomic, lipidomic, glycomic, proteomic and exposomic analyses by increasing measurement sensitivity (e.g. S/N ratio), reducing the de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
83
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the separation of isomers and isobars, and consequently, the acquisition of well-resolved fragmentation spectra is a challenge especially for lipidomics applications [103,104]. In order to obtain a less time-consuming but comprehensive platform, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS, a separation technique based on the mobility of ions through a buffer gas under the influence of an electric field) has been successfully integrated into LC-MS-based lipidomics and metabolomics workflows [96,105]. One of the key advantages of the IMS technique is that it can separate ions in milliseconds based on their shape and size, which is highly convenient for linking LC separations (minutes) and time-of-flight (TOF)-MS detection (microseconds) for the separation of E/Z isomers, sn-positional isomers, and increasing annotation confidence with the addition of collision cross section values [104,105].…”
Section: Instrumental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the separation of isomers and isobars, and consequently, the acquisition of well-resolved fragmentation spectra is a challenge especially for lipidomics applications [103,104]. In order to obtain a less time-consuming but comprehensive platform, ion mobility spectrometry (IMS, a separation technique based on the mobility of ions through a buffer gas under the influence of an electric field) has been successfully integrated into LC-MS-based lipidomics and metabolomics workflows [96,105]. One of the key advantages of the IMS technique is that it can separate ions in milliseconds based on their shape and size, which is highly convenient for linking LC separations (minutes) and time-of-flight (TOF)-MS detection (microseconds) for the separation of E/Z isomers, sn-positional isomers, and increasing annotation confidence with the addition of collision cross section values [104,105].…”
Section: Instrumental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metaproteomics is, however, challenging to perform in soil and there have been few successful examples to date 8 – 10 . However, improving techniques and new methodologies in proteomics have recently made it possible to delve deeper into soil proteomes for the detection of less-abundant proteins 11 , 12 . Therefore, here we used a multi-omics approach, combining DNA and RNA sequencing with metaproteomics, leveraging the strength of each omics method, to better understand how soil viruses respond to environmental changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, ion mobility can rapidly separate metabolite ions based on their differences in rotationally averaged surface area or collision cross-section (CCS) 16,17 . It enables to distinguish the isomeric metabolites that commonly exist in biological samples [18][19][20][21] . Unlike retention time (RT) and MS/MS spectra that are prone to be affected by many experimental factors, CCS is highly reproducible across instruments and labs, and it is much more feasible to be standardized 16,22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%