2022
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2022.877577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion Microbeam Studies of Charge Transport in Semiconductor Radiation Detectors With Three-Dimensional Structures: An Example of LGAD

Abstract: The development of semiconductor detectors with an increased tolerance to high radiation levels often results in devices that deviate significantly from those of the classical design with planar electrodes. Decreasing the charge drift distance and/or introducing localised charge multiplication volumes are two detector development strategies that are often used in an attempt to increase the device radiation hardness. However, such approaches result in a more complex three-dimensional distribution of electrodes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second part of this paper, devoted to GS, is also complementary to our previously published results [6,7]. The main findings of previous studies can be summarized as follows: (1) Gain decreases as carrier density increases; (2) GS is caused by the space charge effect, i.e., electric field screening; (3) GS is more noticeable in non-irradiated LGADs than in irradiated LGADs; (4) The structure of the probing beam and ion's ionization profile affect the GS.…”
Section: Jinst 18 C02059supporting
confidence: 52%
“…The second part of this paper, devoted to GS, is also complementary to our previously published results [6,7]. The main findings of previous studies can be summarized as follows: (1) Gain decreases as carrier density increases; (2) GS is caused by the space charge effect, i.e., electric field screening; (3) GS is more noticeable in non-irradiated LGADs than in irradiated LGADs; (4) The structure of the probing beam and ion's ionization profile affect the GS.…”
Section: Jinst 18 C02059supporting
confidence: 52%
“…However, there are some differences. For example, When it comes to the creation of electron-hole pairs, the laser beam usually operates within a cylinder with a diameter of approximately 10 μm (depending on the laser optics) but for a MIP, this diameter is considerably smaller, leading to more significant screening effects [1,12,23,24,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. BNL LGADs were used for this study.…”
Section: Gain Suppression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%