Abstract:We have furthered our understanding of the separative mechanism of a novel CE approach, termed ion-interaction CZE (II-CZE), developed in our laboratory for the resolution of mixtures of cationic peptides. Thus, II-CZE and RP-HPLC were applied to the separation of peptides differing by a single amino acid substitution in 10-and 12-residue synthetic model peptide sequences. Substitutions differed by a wide range of properties or side-chain type (e.g., alkyl side-chains, polar side-chains, etc.) at the substitut… Show more
“…Nonelectrostatic interactions, absent in DH theory, may also play a large role in determining the degree of ion‐pairing. This is illustrated by the fact that pentafluoropropanoate has been used to separate peptides with substitutions that did not affect the total charge . A semiquantitative treatment in terms of ion‐pairing between the analyte and the BGE ions does, however, capture the general features of the experimental trends.…”
We investigated the effect of the background electrolyte (BGE) anions on the electrophoretic mobilities of the cationic amino acids arginine and lysine and the polycationic peptides tetraarginine, tetralysine, nonaarginine, and nonalysine. BGEs composed of sodium chloride, sodium propane-1,3-disulfonate, and sodium sulfate were used. For the amino acids, determination of the limiting mobility by extrapolation, using the Onsager-Fuoss (OF) theory expression, yielded consistent estimates. For the peptides, however, the estimates of the limiting mobilities were found to spuriously depend on the BGE salt. This paradox was resolved using molecular modeling. Simulations, on all-atom as well as coarse-grained levels, show that significant counterion condensation, an effect not accounted for in OF theory, occurs for the tetra- and nonapeptides, even for low BGE concentrations. Including this effect in the quantitative estimation of the BGE effect on mobility removed the discrepancy between the estimated limiting mobilities in different salts. The counterion condensation was found to be mainly due to electrostatic interactions, with specific ion effects playing a secondary role. Therefore, the conclusions are likely to be generalizable to other analytes with a similar density of charged groups and OF theory is expected to fail in a predictable way for such analytes.
“…Nonelectrostatic interactions, absent in DH theory, may also play a large role in determining the degree of ion‐pairing. This is illustrated by the fact that pentafluoropropanoate has been used to separate peptides with substitutions that did not affect the total charge . A semiquantitative treatment in terms of ion‐pairing between the analyte and the BGE ions does, however, capture the general features of the experimental trends.…”
We investigated the effect of the background electrolyte (BGE) anions on the electrophoretic mobilities of the cationic amino acids arginine and lysine and the polycationic peptides tetraarginine, tetralysine, nonaarginine, and nonalysine. BGEs composed of sodium chloride, sodium propane-1,3-disulfonate, and sodium sulfate were used. For the amino acids, determination of the limiting mobility by extrapolation, using the Onsager-Fuoss (OF) theory expression, yielded consistent estimates. For the peptides, however, the estimates of the limiting mobilities were found to spuriously depend on the BGE salt. This paradox was resolved using molecular modeling. Simulations, on all-atom as well as coarse-grained levels, show that significant counterion condensation, an effect not accounted for in OF theory, occurs for the tetra- and nonapeptides, even for low BGE concentrations. Including this effect in the quantitative estimation of the BGE effect on mobility removed the discrepancy between the estimated limiting mobilities in different salts. The counterion condensation was found to be mainly due to electrostatic interactions, with specific ion effects playing a secondary role. Therefore, the conclusions are likely to be generalizable to other analytes with a similar density of charged groups and OF theory is expected to fail in a predictable way for such analytes.
“…Briefly, the II-CZE approach consists of combining the powerful CZE mechanism (separations based on differences in solute massto-charge ratio) located in the BGE with that of a hydrophobically based mechanism also located in the BGE consisting of high concentrations of perfluorinated acids (TFA; pentafluoropropionic acid (PFPA) and heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA)). The mechanism for the separation of peptides by II-CZE has been discussed previously [28]. In summary, the differences in electrophoretic mobility observed between peptides with subtle differences in hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity at the substitution site are due to interactions of peptides with the bulk BGE.…”
Mixed-mode hydrophilic interaction/cationexchange chromatography: Separation of complex mixtures of peptides of varying charge and hydrophobicity Mixed-mode hydrophilic interaction/cation-exchange chromatography (HILIC/CEX) was applied to the separation of two mixtures of synthetic peptide standards: (i) a 27-peptide mixture containing three groups of peptides (each group containing nine peptides of the same net charge of +1, +2 or +3), where the hydrophilicity/ hydrophobicity of adjacent peptides within the groups varied only subtly (generally by only a single carbon atom); and (ii) peptide pairs with the same composition but different sequences, where the sole difference between the peptides was the position of a single amino acid substitution. HILIC/CEX is essentially CEX chromatography in the presence of high levels of organic modifier (generally ACN). The present study demonstrated the dramatic effect of increasing ACN concentration (optimum levels of 60 -80%, depending on the application) on the separation of both mixtures of peptides. The greater the charge on the peptides, the better the separation achievable by HILIC/CEX. In addition, HILIC/CEX separation of both the peptide mixtures used in the present study was shown to be superior to that of the more commonly applied RP-HPLC mode. Our results highlight again the efficacy of HILIC/CEX as a peptide separation mode in its own right as well as an excellent complement to RP-HPLC.
IntroductionMixed mode hydrophilic interaction/cation-exchange chromatography (HILIC/CEX) is an HPLC approach to peptide separations introduced by our laboratory over 15 years ago [1]. HILIC/CEX combined the most advantageous aspects of two widely different separation mechanisms: a separation based on hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity differences between peptides overlaid on a separation based on net charge [1 -8]. Characteristic of HILIC/ CEX separations is the presence of a high organic modifier concentration (generally, ACN) to promote hydrophilic interactions between the solute and the hydrophilic/charged CEX stationary phase, with peptides then eluted from the column with a salt gradient. Peptides are generally eluted in groups of peptides in order of increasing net positive charge; within these groups, peptides are eluted in order of increasing hydrophilicity (decreasing hydrophobicity). Indeed, HILIC/CEX is basically CEX in the presence of high concentrations of ACN (60 -80%, in general).The HILIC/CEX approach has proven to be very versatile for applications to peptide separations, representing an excellent complement to RP-HPLC and, indeed rivalling or even exceeding RP-HPLC for specific peptide mixtures [2,3,6,9]. For example, HILIC/CEX has successfully separated deletion products from crude synthetic peptides (not achievable by RP-HPLC) [3] as well as enabled the purification of synthetic peptides from closely related serine side-chain acetylated peptides (again not achievable by RP-HPLC) [6]. The complementary nature of HILIC/ CEX and RP-HPLC was also demonstrated by the ...
“…The principle of II-CZE has been successfully applied also for the separation of peptides differing by a single amino acid substitution in deca-and dodecapeptides with model amino acid sequences [98]. Substitutions differed by a wide range of properties, e.g., alkyl side chains, polar side chains, and charged side chains.…”
The article brings a comprehensive survey of recent developments and applications of high-performance capillary electromigration methods, zone electrophoresis, ITP, IEF, affinity electrophoresis, EKC, and electrochromatography, to analysis, preparation, and physicochemical characterization of peptides. New approaches to the theoretical description and experimental verification of electromigration behavior of peptides and to methodology of their separations, such as sample preparation, adsorption suppression, and detection, are presented. Novel developments in individual CE and CEC modes are shown and several types of their applications to peptide analysis are presented: conventional qualitative and quantitative analysis, purity control, determination in biomatrices, monitoring of chemical and enzymatical reactions and physical changes, amino acid and sequence analysis, and peptide mapping of proteins. Some examples of micropreparative peptide separations are given and capabilities of CE and CEC techniques to provide important physicochemical characteristics of peptides are demonstrated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.