2020
DOI: 10.1134/s1063784220110274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion-Beam Methods for High-Precision Processing of Optical Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flatness of the surface is also noticeably inferior to the parameters obtained using traditional optical technologies (lapping allows you to obtain a surface with a height difference of PV < 100 nm and a standard deviation of the surface shape from the plane / sphere RMS < 10 nm). Nevertheless, the roughness values at the level of 1 nm allow us to hope that the use of lapping methods with finishing superpolishing developed in the work of [18], and precision correction of shape errors, including ion-beam methods [19], will allow to obtain roughness and flatness at an acceptable level for X-ray optical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flatness of the surface is also noticeably inferior to the parameters obtained using traditional optical technologies (lapping allows you to obtain a surface with a height difference of PV < 100 nm and a standard deviation of the surface shape from the plane / sphere RMS < 10 nm). Nevertheless, the roughness values at the level of 1 nm allow us to hope that the use of lapping methods with finishing superpolishing developed in the work of [18], and precision correction of shape errors, including ion-beam methods [19], will allow to obtain roughness and flatness at an acceptable level for X-ray optical applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wavefront errors were corrected by correcting the shape of the " large" concave mirror M1 by ion beam etching. The technique of correcting local shape errors by small-sized and wideaperture ion beams is described in detail in [11]. After three iterations (one axisymmetric by a wide-aperture ion beam and two local by a small-sized ion beam), the wavefront errors of the primary mirror M1 were reduced by more 12.5 13.5 than 6 times to RMS ∼ 2.1 nm.…”
Section: Correction Of Wavefront Aberrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%