2005
DOI: 10.1021/jp040592y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion Beam Analyses of Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract: The utility of ion beam analysis (IBA) techniques to quantitatively determine impurities in carbon nanotubes (CNTs) over a wide range of atomic numbers is demonstrated. Such techniques have not previously been used to monitor impurities and their effects in this unique material. Despite the difficulty in mounting the samples (which generally are formed into a powdery aggregate rather in a thin film), it is shown that reliable and accurate measurements of impurity concentrations can be achieved. Particle-induce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We exemplified the first report of Naab et al [22] of hydrogen content on commercially available single-, double-, and multiwalled nanotubes and carbon nanofibers and the report of Gohier et al [23] which found values between 4 and 8 at.% of hydrogen in multiwall carbon nanotubes by using high energy of 35 MeV Cl 7+ ion beam. The hydrogen content in CNW was reported before by Jain et al [24] in percentage of 3%-5% by SIMS and Nuclear Table 1 show values ranging from 4.5 to 10%, values obtained by integrating upon depth (areal density) the spectra shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Erda Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…We exemplified the first report of Naab et al [22] of hydrogen content on commercially available single-, double-, and multiwalled nanotubes and carbon nanofibers and the report of Gohier et al [23] which found values between 4 and 8 at.% of hydrogen in multiwall carbon nanotubes by using high energy of 35 MeV Cl 7+ ion beam. The hydrogen content in CNW was reported before by Jain et al [24] in percentage of 3%-5% by SIMS and Nuclear Table 1 show values ranging from 4.5 to 10%, values obtained by integrating upon depth (areal density) the spectra shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Erda Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The experimental setup used has been described elsewhere [6]. For these measurements, the incident angle of the beam on each sample was perpendicular to the sample surface.…”
Section: Rbs and Pixe Setupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Note that the application of the DataFurnace computation code allows us to report the absolute amount of hydrogen, in contrast to many previous publications, where the quantitative analysis was done using a Kapton standard, which by itself is known to be sensitive to ion beam induced damage. 15,17,18,23 In all of our experiments, the amount of hydrogen significantly decreased with increasing growth time and array height. The 60−70 μm arrays showed about 0.7 wt % of hydrogen, which is still considerably higher than previously reported values for MWCNTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For taller arrays (up to 500 μm) the hydrogen signal was almost constant (data not shown) within the accuracy of ERDA measurements, which is about 10%. 18 Previous attempts to characterize VA-MWCNTs, published by Gohier et al, 14 were based upon ERDA studies using highenergy, 35 MeV Cl ++ ion beam and very short, 180−380 nm, CNTs with and without nitrogen doping. The relative concentrations of nitrogen and hydrogen were calculated by means of ECPE (Element Concentration Profiles from ERDA) computer code.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation