Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1977
DOI: 10.1017/s002237780002050x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ion and electron heating in the earth's bow shock region

Abstract: Ion and electron heating in the earth's bow shock region is studied in terms of the modified two stream instability by treating the electron's response to be electromagnetic and that of ions to be electrostatic. The modified two stream flute mode, driven unstable by the density and temperature gradients, can heat the ions to about 50 times their upstream temperature. However, the electrons are heated mainly by the non-flute mode and their temperature can be increased by a factor of 1·5 or more. Consequently th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ions are heated principally in the perpendicular direction, while the electrons are heated mainly parallel to the magnetic field and have a flattop distribution. The large ion heating that occurs in the zero beta limit was first shown by Revathy and Lakina [1977]. At higher beta, the…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The ions are heated principally in the perpendicular direction, while the electrons are heated mainly parallel to the magnetic field and have a flattop distribution. The large ion heating that occurs in the zero beta limit was first shown by Revathy and Lakina [1977]. At higher beta, the…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The anomalous collision frequency due to plasma instabilities driven essentially by field-aligned currents is typically a fraction of the ion cyclotron frequency, i.e., van "" •p [Dum and Dupree, 1970;Treumann et at., 1991], whereas it can be substantially higher for the case of perpendicular current-driven instabilities [LaBette and Treumann, 1988;Thorne and Tsurutani, 1991]. Anomalous collision frequencies can be used to estimate the cross-field diffusion coefficient [Ichimaru, 1973]: The dielectric constant, e(w, k), for the lower hybrid waves is given by [Lakhina and Sen, 1973;Davidson, 1978;Revathy and Lakhina, 1977] -+ = 0, (8)…”
Section: Anomalous Diffusion From Plasma Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the JBL, B0 • 5 nT, and assuming a proton kinetic energy of I keV, we get from (3) the maximum diffusion rate, Dmax -105 km 2 s -1. Then taking the magnetic wave power of • 10 -1 nT 2 at resonance, the cross-field diffusion as calculated from (2) Lakhina, 1977;Papadopoulos, 1979]. Like the lower hybrid drift instability, this instability also leads to anomalous resistivity and cross-field particle diffusion.…”
Section: Cross-field Diffusion and Boundary Layer Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the important generation models are based on the lower hybrid drift instability (LHDI) driven essentially by the density gradients [36][37][38], field-aligned current driven instabilities, like ion-acoustic instability [39], and ion cyclotron instability [40], ion beam instabilities [41][42][43][44][45][46][47], electron beam instabilities [34,35,[48][49][50][51], loss cone instabilities generated by the electron loss distributions [52], and velocity shear and current convective instabilities [27,29,30,[53][54][55][56][57]. The mechanism of current convective instability demands thickness of the magnetopause current layer, Ä, to be very narrow such that Ä AE , where AE Ô ( and Ô are the speed of light and the electron plasma frequency, respectively) is the electron skin depth.…”
Section: Generation Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%