1987
DOI: 10.1136/gut.28.4.474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IOIBD report no 1: Observer variation in calculating indices of severity and activity in Crohn's disease. International Organisation for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical activities of the patients with UC were determined using the clinical activity index (CAI) and ulcerative colitis activity index (UCAI). 15,16 For the patients with CD, Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) 17 and the index of inflammatory bowel disease (IOIBD) 18 were determined. The ethics committee of Nihon University Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital approved the study protocol.…”
Section: Patients and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical activities of the patients with UC were determined using the clinical activity index (CAI) and ulcerative colitis activity index (UCAI). 15,16 For the patients with CD, Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) 17 and the index of inflammatory bowel disease (IOIBD) 18 were determined. The ethics committee of Nihon University Nerima Hikarigaoka Hospital approved the study protocol.…”
Section: Patients and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primeira delas refere-se à variação existente entre os resultados de avaliações efetuadas por diferentes avaliadores (21) ; a segunda diz respeito à falta de objetividade de variáveis como intensidade da dor e sentimento de bem-estar geral, intimamente dependentes das percepções do paciente em relação à própria doença e do limiar de dor; essa subjetividade também parece estar ligada aos casos em que pacientes tomando placebo apresentam índices elevados de melhora em alguns ensaios clínicos (22) . Além disso, a necessidade de o paciente registrar diariamente algumas variáveis por sete dias também dificulta a larga utilização desse índice na prática clínica comum.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The CDAI appeared to be relatively reliable if used by these observers well experienced in its application. However, significant inter-observer differences were later noted in a series of separate studies, published as a single paper [17] . In one study, the CDAI was calculated from 10 "paper cases" evaluated by 5 consultants in surgery or gastroenterology, and 2 research assistants.…”
Section: Observer Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, some symptoms may be difficult to interpret or quantitate easily. For example, "liquid" stools may be difficult to precisely define [17] . Finally, even though enterocutaneous fistulae may be very troublesome for the patient, their impact on the CDAI may be limited.…”
Section: Other Cdai Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%