2013
DOI: 10.4038/sjdem.v3i1.5469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Iodine status of pregnant women in Sri Lanka

Abstract: Based on new evidence and lessons learned within the last decade, pregnant women may not receive adequate iodized salt where the coverage of universal salt iodisation is poor. World Health Organisation has stated this could jeopardize optimal brain development of the fetus. This study was aimed to assess the iodine status of pregnant women in Sri Lanka. A cross-sectional clinic based nationally representative study was conducted. Three randomly selected antenatal clinics from each province, 30 randomly selecte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…36 On the contrary in a prospective study from iodine-replete Iran by Ainy et al MUIC in the three trimesters were 193 μg/L, 159 μg/ L, and 141 μg/L, respectively, a decrescendo pattern, with statistically significant inter-trimester variation and values reaching inadequate levels in the third trimester has been observed and similar statistically significant decrescendo pattern was also described by Jayatisa et al with MUIC 155.3 μg/L, 117.3 μg/L and 100.6 μg/L in 1st,2nd and 3rd Trimester respectively. 37,38 This is in contrast to Rajput et al who reported in their study that trimester specific MUIC levels decreased progressively from 193.2 μg/L to 111.8 μg/L to 97.65 μg/L as gestational age increased from 1st to 2nd to 3rd trimester respectively but this decrease with gestational age was not statistically significant. They stated that the increased thyroidal iodide clearance and shift to fetalplacental unit as pregnancy advances may explain the observation of progressive MUIC decrease during gestation.…”
Section: Trimester-wise Iodine Status Of Pregnant Womencontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…36 On the contrary in a prospective study from iodine-replete Iran by Ainy et al MUIC in the three trimesters were 193 μg/L, 159 μg/ L, and 141 μg/L, respectively, a decrescendo pattern, with statistically significant inter-trimester variation and values reaching inadequate levels in the third trimester has been observed and similar statistically significant decrescendo pattern was also described by Jayatisa et al with MUIC 155.3 μg/L, 117.3 μg/L and 100.6 μg/L in 1st,2nd and 3rd Trimester respectively. 37,38 This is in contrast to Rajput et al who reported in their study that trimester specific MUIC levels decreased progressively from 193.2 μg/L to 111.8 μg/L to 97.65 μg/L as gestational age increased from 1st to 2nd to 3rd trimester respectively but this decrease with gestational age was not statistically significant. They stated that the increased thyroidal iodide clearance and shift to fetalplacental unit as pregnancy advances may explain the observation of progressive MUIC decrease during gestation.…”
Section: Trimester-wise Iodine Status Of Pregnant Womencontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Further, Sri Lanka was considered as having achieved all the criteria of WHO/ICCIDD for monitoring progress towards sustainable elimination of IDD. However, no national level studies have been conducted to assess the iodine nutrition in pregnant women in Sri Lanka up to 2010, when a study revealed that the overall median urine iodine concentration among pregnant women was 113.7 μg/L indicating an iodine deficiency in Sri Lankan pregnant women [ 24 ]. This cross sectional study showed that pregnant women who were in the second and third trimesters had lower UI level than first trimester pregnant women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study has some important points. The design was suited to evaluate changes in iodine nutrition during the course of the pregnancy because we measured the urine iodine excretion in each trimester in the same study subject whereas many of the other studies were done in cross- sectional manner [ 18 , 24 , 26 , 27 ]. Pregnant women of the study sample were not given iodine supplements and it mainly explores the effectiveness of iodized salt, diet and water as sources of iodine during pregnancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) The median UIC of pregnant women is only marginally above the recommended cut off of 150 µg/L, and iodine-insufficient in the first trimester (102.3 (61.7-147.1) µg/L (Table 2)). There was a remarkable improvement in the iodine status of pregnant women compared to 2011 (113.7 µg/L) [30]. There was also a significant minority of pregnant women (nearly 10%) who had a median UIC of <50 µg/L.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%