2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00499.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involving people with learning disabilities in research: issues and possibilities

Abstract: Advances in the social position of people with learning disabilities have led to a situation where research and evaluation studies are increasingly required to include the views and opinions of people with learning disabilities. One key outcome of this shift is that some of the major funding bodies now insist on the inclusion of people with learning disabilities as a condition of research funding. This has produced new possibilities and new challenges for researchers, and it has real consequences for people wo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
134
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
134
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the biggest challenges in measuring QoL is trying to capture the uniqueness of this concept for each individual (Padaiga et al 2007), which means that it is not always desirable to start from an objective standard of QoL. Many standardized instruments start from professionals' definition of what they think is important for a good QoL and are not based on clients' or patients' own life experiences (Gilbert 2004). This might result in a ''tyranny of quality'' (Goode and Hogg 1994) when QoL is conceptualised in such a structured way, that it ignores individual experiences.…”
Section: The Concept Of Qolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the biggest challenges in measuring QoL is trying to capture the uniqueness of this concept for each individual (Padaiga et al 2007), which means that it is not always desirable to start from an objective standard of QoL. Many standardized instruments start from professionals' definition of what they think is important for a good QoL and are not based on clients' or patients' own life experiences (Gilbert 2004). This might result in a ''tyranny of quality'' (Goode and Hogg 1994) when QoL is conceptualised in such a structured way, that it ignores individual experiences.…”
Section: The Concept Of Qolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future research, it would be useful to make a shift from participative to emancipatory research (Gilbert 2004). In participative research, researchers and participants collaborate, but the bulk of responsibility and decision-making rests with the researcher (Walmsley 2001).…”
Section: Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of methodologies for the social study of disability have been conceptualised in the English-language literature as 'inclusive research', and applied more frequently to groups with cognitive disabilities (Gilbert, 2004;Walmsley, 2004). In these studies, persons with disabilities participate in all stages of the research process, from the initial defi nition of goals to the drafting of the fi nal report and dissemination of results, and may also be involved in managing and leading the process (Boland et al, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformation is conceptualised rather differently in the participatory research literature. Participation is argued to bring about changes in the power relationships (French and Swain 2004;Gilbert 2004); changes in attitude; changes in funding priorities (Duckett and Pratt 2001) or changes in practice. The emphasis within participatory research on owning the research, sharing power, as well as having control and choice means that participatory research is strongly linked to empowerment.…”
Section: Identifying Outcome As a Potential Focus For Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%