2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00560.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involving older people in research: methodological issues

Abstract: The policy imperative to increase public participation in health and social care research, planning and service delivery raises significant questions about optimum approaches, methods and the extent to which this policy can influence change in practice. This paper highlights the key policy literature on user involvement and participatory research methods to establish the context for a partnership research project exploring perceptions of risk in relation to falls from the perspectives of older people, carers, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
97
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Involvement of the elders throughout the project has generated interest and commitment among the participants as well as among the public actors. Increased commitment is a finding also reported in other studies of user involvement (Ross et al 2005;Ståhl et al 2008). The participatory observation allowed for first-hand experience with users walking with aids or struggling with constraints, and provided a better understanding of how the environment can be facilitated for them, as highlighted in Ståhl et al (2008).…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of The Three-step Mixed-methods Apprsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Involvement of the elders throughout the project has generated interest and commitment among the participants as well as among the public actors. Increased commitment is a finding also reported in other studies of user involvement (Ross et al 2005;Ståhl et al 2008). The participatory observation allowed for first-hand experience with users walking with aids or struggling with constraints, and provided a better understanding of how the environment can be facilitated for them, as highlighted in Ståhl et al (2008).…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of The Three-step Mixed-methods Apprsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…User involvement among seniors is perceived by participants as positive, empowering and confidence building Eur J Ageing (2015) 12:249-260 251 (Ross et al 2005;Ståhl et al 2008), which is especially important when establishing a walking strategy-the overarching goal of this project. Planners and health advisors from the municipality and the Norwegian Public Roads Administration contributed in developing the study and were co-collectors of data in the participatory observation (2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving further along the continuum to involve users as research partners implies that elderly people are engaged in data collection, data analyses, etc. In designing the current project, we strived to create authentic opportunities for user involvement achieved within the framework of a research project (Ross et al 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluations should also reflect the criteria of good practice in public involvement (most clearly set out on the INVOLVE website 2008), where genuine engagement by researchers is expressed through giving time, respect, access, support, recognition and reward; 1 National Institute for Health Research defines such input as from 'a patient, carer, member of an organisation or group promoting users' interests, possibly a long-term user of services or a member of the public who may be a potential recipient of a health programme' http://www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/ ppihs1.html, downloaded 16/10/08 and by being responsive to suggestions made by lay participants. The expected gains for research include a more relevant research agenda that reflects patient experiences (Tallon et al, 2000): increased patient advocacy for research (Goodacre, 1999): and improved health literacy around the constraints of research (Ross et al, 2004).…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%