2021
DOI: 10.1111/hex.13188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involving an individual with lived‐experience in a co‐analysis of qualitative data

Abstract: Background People with lived‐experience of the phenomenon under investigation are seldom involved in the analysis of qualitative data, and there exists little guidance for those wishing to involve contributors at this stage of research. Aims To critically reflect on the process of involving people with lived‐experience in a thematic analysis and to offer direction to other researchers. Methods An individual with lived‐experience of residing in prison contributed to a co‐analysis of qualitative data using thema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(115 reference statements)
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The groups were recorded, transcribed, and incorporated into the analysis. The co-analysis ensured that practices emerging from the research team's analysis of the transcripts were consistent with the participants lived experiences of the SEED program [45]. Co-generation and interpretation of data is a critical element of PNI and ensures credibility and trustworthiness of the study findings [46; 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The groups were recorded, transcribed, and incorporated into the analysis. The co-analysis ensured that practices emerging from the research team's analysis of the transcripts were consistent with the participants lived experiences of the SEED program [45]. Co-generation and interpretation of data is a critical element of PNI and ensures credibility and trustworthiness of the study findings [46; 47].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The groups were recorded, transcribed, and incorporated into the analysis. The co-analysis ensured that practices emerging from the research team’s analysis of the transcripts were consistent with the participants’ lived experiences of the SEED program [ 47 ]. Co-generation and interpretation of data is a critical element of PNI and ensures credibility and trustworthiness of the study findings [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inductive thematic analysis was performed by the research team using the data transcripts [ 24 ]. This inductive method was chosen for its lack of assumptions regarding the patterns of meaning contained within the data [ 24 ] and is a method commonly employed in co-design research [ 25 26 27 ]. Analysis was conducted in parallel with data collection to ensure that any issues raised are explored in co-design sessions in the development of the solution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%