2014
DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2013.846241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement, Tolerance for Ambiguity, and Type of Service Moderate the Effectiveness of Probability Marker Usage in Service Advertising

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, people show more optimism about distant future than proximal outcomes (Trope & Liberman, 2010). Extant research has indicated that individual differences, such as tolerance for ambiguity (Banks & De Pelsmacker, 2014), regulatory focus (A. Y. Lee & Aaker, 2004), and consideration of future consequences (CFC), affect how people respond to temporally framed messages across multiple outcomes.…”
Section: Temporal Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, people show more optimism about distant future than proximal outcomes (Trope & Liberman, 2010). Extant research has indicated that individual differences, such as tolerance for ambiguity (Banks & De Pelsmacker, 2014), regulatory focus (A. Y. Lee & Aaker, 2004), and consideration of future consequences (CFC), affect how people respond to temporally framed messages across multiple outcomes.…”
Section: Temporal Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%