2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of the Second Extracellular Loop and Transmembrane Residues of CCR5 in Inhibitor Binding and HIV-1 Fusion: Insights into the Mechanism of Allosteric Inhibition

Abstract: SummaryThe C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5), a member of G-protein-coupled receptors, serves as a coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). In the present study, we examined the interactions between CCR5 and novel CCR5 inhibitors containing the spirodiketopiperazine (SDP) scaffold, AK530 and AK317, both of which were lodged in the hydrophobic cavity located between the upper transmembrane domain and the second extracellular loop (ECL2) of CCR5. Although substantial differences existed between … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
65
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
8
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of this assumption, we have observed that both inhibitors interfere with the binding of the anti-CCR5 mAb 45531 to the distal half of ECL2 (but not with the binding of the anti-CCR5 mAbs 2D7 and CTC5 to the proximal half of ECL2 and the receptor N-terminal tail, respectively). These findings are in fact fully consistent with recent structural data on related CCR5 inhibitors indicating that their binding to the receptor disrupts interhelix interactions and interactions between helices and ECL2 (27).…”
Section: Tak779 and Mvc Are Inverse Agonists For Ccr5 Which Stabilizsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In support of this assumption, we have observed that both inhibitors interfere with the binding of the anti-CCR5 mAb 45531 to the distal half of ECL2 (but not with the binding of the anti-CCR5 mAbs 2D7 and CTC5 to the proximal half of ECL2 and the receptor N-terminal tail, respectively). These findings are in fact fully consistent with recent structural data on related CCR5 inhibitors indicating that their binding to the receptor disrupts interhelix interactions and interactions between helices and ECL2 (27).…”
Section: Tak779 and Mvc Are Inverse Agonists For Ccr5 Which Stabilizsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Whether MAb 45531 binds to a signaling-active conformation of CCR5 remains to be determined, although there is some indirect support for this scenario. The binding of small-molecule inhibitors interferes with the binding of only a few CCR5 MAbs, a prominent example being 45531 (19,30,31,52,54). We found that the CCR5 binding of 45531, but not other MAbs, such as 2D7 and PA14, was significantly reduced when VVC was added (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…This resistance pathway often, but not always, results in a virus that is resistant to multiple CCR5 antagonists (22,33,39,53,56). The CCR5 antagonists that have been used clinically all seem to bind to a hydrophobic region in the transmembrane helices of CCR5 and induce conformational alterations in the extracellular domains of the coreceptor that inhibit recognition by gp120 (13,31,32,46,52). These conformational alterations are similar though not identical as judged by the ability of these compounds to affect the binding of various conformation-dependent monoclonal antibodies to CCR5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions between gp120 and CCR5 occur in at least two distinct areas: (i) the bridging sheet and the stem of the V3 loop interact with sulfated tyrosine residues in the NЈ terminus of CCR5, and (ii) the crown of the V3 loop is thought to engage the extracellular loops (ECLs), particularly ECL2, of CCR5 (10-12, 14, 18, 28). Small-molecule CCR5 antagonists bind to a hydrophobic pocket in the transmembrane helices of CCR5 and exert their effects on HIV by altering the position of the ECLs, making them allosteric inhibitors of HIV infection (13,31,32,46,52). The conformational changes in CCR5 that are induced by CCR5 antagonists vary to some degree with different drugs, as evidenced by differential binding of antibodies and chemokines to various drug-bound forms of CCR5 (47,54).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%