1999
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.113.1.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of rodent prefrontal cortex subregions in strategy switching.

Abstract: The present study examined whether inactivation of the prelimbic-infralimbic areas or the dorsal anterior cingulate area impairs strategy switching in the cheeseboard task. After implantation of a cannula aimed at either the prelimbic-infralimbic or dorsal anterior cingulate areas, all rats were tested in a spatial and a visual-cued version of the task. Some of the rats received the spatial version first, followed by the visual-cued version. The procedure for the other rats was reversed. Infusions of 2% tetrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
148
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(70 reference statements)
16
148
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Gisquet-Verrier and Delatour (2006) recently concluded that previous experiments demonstrating delay-dependent deficits in mPFC-lesioned rats were better explained by an inability to adjust to novel training protocols. Indeed, recent studies focus on the role of mPFC in switching tasks or the sensory modality on which a decision is based (Ragozzino et al, 1999(Ragozzino et al, , 2003Birrell and Brown, 2000). Additional experiments using delay tasks that tightly control behavior will be needed to definitely test the working memory role of the mPFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gisquet-Verrier and Delatour (2006) recently concluded that previous experiments demonstrating delay-dependent deficits in mPFC-lesioned rats were better explained by an inability to adjust to novel training protocols. Indeed, recent studies focus on the role of mPFC in switching tasks or the sensory modality on which a decision is based (Ragozzino et al, 1999(Ragozzino et al, , 2003Birrell and Brown, 2000). Additional experiments using delay tasks that tightly control behavior will be needed to definitely test the working memory role of the mPFC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, possible that simply changing the number of extramaze cues can cause such results (Ragozzino et al, 1999;Gisquet-Verrier and Delatour, 2006). We next tested, by using a new set of animals with mPFC lesion, whether changing the environment from one cue to four cues affected performance of spatial memory retrieval.…”
Section: Contextual Change Does Not Disrupt the Performance Of Mpfc-lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in previous experiments (Ragozzino et al, 1999a(Ragozzino et al, , 1999bRagozzino, 2002) the stain was used to highlight the location of the cannula tip. Rats were perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline followed by a 4% formaldehyde solution.…”
Section: Histologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, lesions, temporary inactivation, or targeted pharmacological manipulations centered in the rat prelimbic area do not impair the initial acquisition or reversal learning of different discrimination tasks, i.e., a two-choice spatial discrimination (Birrell & Brown, 2000;Chudasasma et al, 2001;Ragozzino et al, 1999aRagozzino et al, , 2003, but do impair learning in extra-dimensional shifts when a rat must shift from using one type of attribute information to using a different type of attribute information (Birrell & Brown, 2000;deBruin, Sanchez-Santed, Heinsbroek, Donker, & Postmes, 1994;Ragozzino et al, 1999aRagozzino et al, , 2003Ragozzino, Wilcox, Raso, & Kesner, 1999b;Ragozzino, 2002;Stefani, Groth, & Moghaddam, 2003). The pattern of results suggests that the rat prelimbic area, located in the medial prefrontal cortex, supports learning when conditions demand complete inhibition of responding to stimuli in a particular dimension while learning what stimulus in a different dimension is critical for correct responding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%