2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of cell proliferation and cell enlargement in increasing the fruit size of Malus species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
85
2
Order By: Relevance
“…2B). These data are in good agreement with the small amount of data available elsewhere concerning tomato pericarp (Bohner and Bangerth, 1988;Cong et al, 2002) and other fleshy fruits (Coombe, 1976;Gray et al, 1999;Higashi et al, 1999;Harada et al, 2005). They also indicate that the 20 tomato genotypes display a broad range of values, from 1 to 14, for their mean pericarp cell volume at the end of fruit growth.…”
Section: Ploidy Analysis In Tomato Fruitsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…2B). These data are in good agreement with the small amount of data available elsewhere concerning tomato pericarp (Bohner and Bangerth, 1988;Cong et al, 2002) and other fleshy fruits (Coombe, 1976;Gray et al, 1999;Higashi et al, 1999;Harada et al, 2005). They also indicate that the 20 tomato genotypes display a broad range of values, from 1 to 14, for their mean pericarp cell volume at the end of fruit growth.…”
Section: Ploidy Analysis In Tomato Fruitsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Most studies on apples have found negative correlation between mean fruit weight and crop load (Elfving and Schechter, 1993;Embree et al, 2007;Wright et al, 2006). This is due to the fact that fruit size is mainly determined by the number of cells per fruit and their subsequent enlargement (Harada et al, 2005), and both factors are affected by the competition for carbon between developing fruits as crop load increases (Ho, 1992). In the Argentinean apple fresh market, only fruits with diameter up to 61 mm can be sold (SENASA, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lular processes that produce the final size of fleshy fruits (Gillaspy et al 1993). Comparative studies attribute cultivar fruit size variation to cell number (Scorza et al 1991;Yamaguchi et al 2004;Olmstead et al 2007;Quilot and Génard 2008;Hammami et al 2011) or both cell number and size when wild genotypes are included in the comparison (Yamaguchi et al 2002;Harada et al 2005). However, although exocarp cell activity is considered to be a relevant component of fruit development (Gillaspy et al 1993;Lemaire-Chamley et al 2005;Fu et al 2010), it has generally not been considered in studies of fruit growth or with respect to genetically based size differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%