2007
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00761.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of adipose tissues in the early hypolipidemic action of PPARγ agonism in the rat

Abstract: December 14, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00761.2006.-Agonists of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ␥ (PPAR␥) are insulin sensitizers that potently improve lipemia in rodents. This study aimed to determine the contribution of lipid secretion vs. clearance and the involvement of white adipose tissue (WAT) and brown adipose tissue (BAT) in the rapid hypolipidemic action of PPAR␥ agonism. Male rats were treated with rosiglitazone (RSG; 15 mg ⅐ kg Ϫ1 ⅐ day Ϫ1 ) for 1 to 4 days, and determinants of lipid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the specific levels of UCP1 mRNA and protein (i.e., expressed per mRNA or protein units, respectively) were unchanged or only slightly increased (ϳ60% as a mean of the articles quoted below) in BAT of rodents treated with PPAR␥ agonists (2, 7, 9, 15-17, 28 -31, 36, 44, 46, 47) (however, total UCP1 content in BAT of treated animals was somewhat more increased, ϳ2-fold, due to tissue enlargement). In two recent investigations, robust 3-fold increases in specific UCP1 gene expression were reported (15,29), demonstrating that also in vivo PPAR␥ agonists have the ability to affect UCP1 gene expression. However, even threefold increases are marginal compared with the ϳ1,000-fold increase in UCP1 gene expression seen here in the cell culture system (estimated from quantitative PCR measurements of RNA from cultures grown as those examined in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus the specific levels of UCP1 mRNA and protein (i.e., expressed per mRNA or protein units, respectively) were unchanged or only slightly increased (ϳ60% as a mean of the articles quoted below) in BAT of rodents treated with PPAR␥ agonists (2, 7, 9, 15-17, 28 -31, 36, 44, 46, 47) (however, total UCP1 content in BAT of treated animals was somewhat more increased, ϳ2-fold, due to tissue enlargement). In two recent investigations, robust 3-fold increases in specific UCP1 gene expression were reported (15,29), demonstrating that also in vivo PPAR␥ agonists have the ability to affect UCP1 gene expression. However, even threefold increases are marginal compared with the ϳ1,000-fold increase in UCP1 gene expression seen here in the cell culture system (estimated from quantitative PCR measurements of RNA from cultures grown as those examined in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…3 This study also confirms the robust hypotriglyceridemic action of PPAR-g agonism, which is, in contrast to 11b-HSD1 inhibition, mainly due to a marked potentiation of TG clearance by adipose tissues in the rat. 7 It can be noted that the combination of CA and RSG tended to exert additive effects on triglyceridemia; however, as in the case of insulinemia, RSG alone was quite potent and may have precluded any further large reduction. The distinct modes of action of these compounds on triglyceridemia render their combination of particular interest for further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6 At least in rodents, triglyceridemia is also dramatically reduced by PPAR-g agonists, mainly due to enhanced clearance by adipose tissues. 7 Both 11b-HSD1 inhibition and PPAR-g agonism therefore improve liver lipid metabolism and lipemia. The effect of their combination, however, has not been investigated to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, surgical removal of visceral adipose tissue or exercise training that led to redistributing visceral to subcutaneous fat in nonpregnant rats improved insulin action (19,23). Thus it is possible that RG may partially exert its insulin-sensitizing effect by redistributing fat depots from visceral to a subcutaneous location (27,28). This WAT Fig.…”
Section: E493 Ppar␥ Agonist In the Iugr Offspringmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In animals, TZDs improved insulin sensitivity in high-fat-diet-fed rats (44), obese Zucker rats, and Zucker diabetic fatty rats (45,47). However, in these situations, the rats demonstrated a prior accumulation of WAT providing a platform for TZD action (27,28). Whether a similar beneficial effect will be realized in the metabolically maladaptive pregestational female adult IUGR and/or PNGR rat offspring that lack a comparable accumulation of WAT is not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%