1982
DOI: 10.1042/bj2070341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involvement of a single thiol group in the conversion of the NAD+-dependent activity of rat liver xanthine oxidoreductase to the O2-dependent activity

Abstract: The effects of 2-iodosobenzoic acid, 4-chloromercuribenzoate, 5,5'-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) and tetraethylthioperoxydicarbonic diamide (disulphiram) on the NAD+-dependent activity of xanthine oxidoreductase from rat liver were investigated. Only disulphiram converted the NAD+-dependent activity into the O2-dependent activity quantitatively, without changing the xanthine hydroxylation rate. The modification process was a first-order reaction with respect to time (min) and disulphiram concentration (micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This enhancement may be due to xanthine dehydrogenase, which is present in liver slices. Xanthine oxidase differs from xanthine dehydrogenase in the presence of a sulphydryl group (32). Conversion of xanthine oxidase from dehydrogenase (0 form) into an oxidase (0 form) occurs upon oxidation or binding of sulphydryl groups by several oxidising agents or ligands (33,34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enhancement may be due to xanthine dehydrogenase, which is present in liver slices. Xanthine oxidase differs from xanthine dehydrogenase in the presence of a sulphydryl group (32). Conversion of xanthine oxidase from dehydrogenase (0 form) into an oxidase (0 form) occurs upon oxidation or binding of sulphydryl groups by several oxidising agents or ligands (33,34).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that parts of cysteine residues are close enough to readily form disulfide bridges within the enzyme because cysteine disulfide bridges were formed by reaction with 4-PDS rather than single cysteine residues being modified (8,17). Although it has been reported that a single cysteine residue is involved in the conversion (18), the method employed in the report is not appropriate for the determination of the number of residues in chemical modification studies, as discussed by Rakitzis (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…this conversion can be reversible, through oxidation of key cysteine residues, or irreversible, by limited proteolysis. *** ,157,236-252 however, the extent and *** it is to be emphasized that mammalian Xo and Xd are two forms of the same protein (same gene product) that arise as the result of posttranslational conformational modifications (oxidation of key cysteine residues or limited proteolysis); 157, [236][237][238][239][240][241][242][243][244][245][246][247][248][249][250][251][252] to designate the two forms, without regard to the oxidizing substrate, it is preferable to use the denomination "xanthine oxidoreductase". the only functional distinction between Xd and Xo lies in the electron acceptor used by each form: while Xd transfers the electrons preferentially to nad + (but it can also reduce dioxygen), Xo fails to react with nad + and uses exclusively dioxygen.…”
Section: The Xanthine Oxidase Familymentioning
confidence: 99%