2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1200888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involuntary psychiatric treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. An international qualitative study

Abstract: BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, studies report that in the first few months of the lockdown there was a decrease in requests for mandatory psychiatric treatment, while, in contrast, following the second wave, the number of cases increased. This study investigates the use of compulsory psychiatric treatments internationally in the first and subsequent phases of the pandemic.MethodsSixteen key people were interviewed: eight mental health care professionals and eight scholars in Italy, Greece, China and C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research took into consideration the experiences of a specific group of teachers, so the answers will be limited to the Italian reality, and in particular, to the capital. The second limitation concerns the fact that the interviews were conducted in the first academic year after the pandemic, which was characterized by a full reopening of schools and a return to full-time teaching; this meant that the interviewees found themselves in a difficult period of readjustment to school life [37] and emerging social challenges [38,39]. The statements of the interviewees should be anchored to this particular and unique moment for schools.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research took into consideration the experiences of a specific group of teachers, so the answers will be limited to the Italian reality, and in particular, to the capital. The second limitation concerns the fact that the interviews were conducted in the first academic year after the pandemic, which was characterized by a full reopening of schools and a return to full-time teaching; this meant that the interviewees found themselves in a difficult period of readjustment to school life [37] and emerging social challenges [38,39]. The statements of the interviewees should be anchored to this particular and unique moment for schools.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%