2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Involuntary attentional shifts as a function of set and processing fluency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This instruction was inspired by the most frequently mentioned strategy for thought suppression: try to think of something else (Uleman & Bargh, 1989). This strategy has also been reported by subjects in the funneled debriefing questionnaires from previous RITs (Allen et al, 2013, Gardner et al, 2020. The present study also asked subjects to report the imagery after each trial, which further corroborated the occurrence of the imagery, which also allowed us to investigate the degree of influence that the presented image might have on the generation of random imagery.…”
Section: Urge Due To Self Of the Experienced Imagerysupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This instruction was inspired by the most frequently mentioned strategy for thought suppression: try to think of something else (Uleman & Bargh, 1989). This strategy has also been reported by subjects in the funneled debriefing questionnaires from previous RITs (Allen et al, 2013, Gardner et al, 2020. The present study also asked subjects to report the imagery after each trial, which further corroborated the occurrence of the imagery, which also allowed us to investigate the degree of influence that the presented image might have on the generation of random imagery.…”
Section: Urge Due To Self Of the Experienced Imagerysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Other than the efficacy of the strategy, the present study also investigates how the presence of external stimuli may modulate the subject's sense of control and sense of agency. Both subjects' report of difficulty in previous RIT study (Gardner et al, 2020) and subjects' inability to suppress the involuntary mental imagery on the majority of trials in Allen et al (2013) demonstrated how challenging the task was. The reported difficulty of the RIT may be due to interference of the external stimuli, as it closely resembles subjects' experiences in studies using paradigms such as the Flanker and Stroop task (Morsella et al, 2011;Riddle et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, RIT effects have arisen from (a) syntactic processing ( Bui et al, 2019 ); (b) mental rotation ( Cushing et al, 2019 ); (c) musical imagery ( White et al, 2018 ); (d) high-level shifts in spatial attention ( Gardner et al, 2020 ); (e) insight-related processes (e.g., the insight that “candle” is associated with the stimuli WAX and FLAME; Bui et al, 2019 ); (f) and the type of sophisticated visuospatial imagery that occurs in chess ( Cushing et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Gardner et al (2020) have shown that involuntary attentional shifting can be associated with a non-perceptual stimulus characteristics, namely, word processing fluency (i.e., the ease with which information is processed). Subjects were asked to focus their gaze on a fixation cross and maintain their gaze, even if words appeared around the cross.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%