Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-25632-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invoking New Metropolitan Imaginaries: What Type of Metropolitan Region for What Kind of Metropolitan Planning and Governance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While city-regions were territories framed as problematic in the old nomenclature, city-regions have become the bearers of hope for a regionalised economy geared towards constant innovation, with European or global significance. Sometimes this shift finds its expression in new imaginaries such as metropolitan regions, indicating higher international relevance, bigness and symbolic power (Fedeli, Harrison and Feiertag 2020). 1 These city-regions are supposed to develop new forms of governance such as voluntary and public-private self-organisation, also in anticipation of some form of devolution of statutory tasks or public policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While city-regions were territories framed as problematic in the old nomenclature, city-regions have become the bearers of hope for a regionalised economy geared towards constant innovation, with European or global significance. Sometimes this shift finds its expression in new imaginaries such as metropolitan regions, indicating higher international relevance, bigness and symbolic power (Fedeli, Harrison and Feiertag 2020). 1 These city-regions are supposed to develop new forms of governance such as voluntary and public-private self-organisation, also in anticipation of some form of devolution of statutory tasks or public policies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking forward the notion of agglomeration as being instrumentally valid within a range of spatial imaginaries (Fedeli et al, 2020) -as a justifying logic of sorts -the key conceptual contribution of this paper is to argue that the governance attempts inspired by polycentrism can be conceptualised in terms of the activation of the dimensions comprising the TPSN (territory, place, scale, network) framework (Jessop et al, 2008). Critically, this activation hinges on a recursive relationship with the spatial economic system itself, and whether the system is seen, by policymakers and lobbyists, to hinge on the size of the urban centres existing within the geography (morphological PUR), the interactions across the centres (functional PUR), or a combination of the two (Burger and Meijers, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%