2005
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-09342005000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invocación de actitudes: El juego de la gradación de la valoración en el discurso

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
22

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
22
Order By: Relevance
“…The metafunctional nature of this theory not only provides a systematic means for differentiating interpersonal meaning from ideational and textual meanings, but also for exploring how they relate to each other. Within SFL, Appraisal offers the theorization of interpersonal meaning choices in discourse (see Martin, 2000;Martin & Rose, 2003, 2007Hood, 2004;Hood & Martin, 2005;Martin & White, 2005). A central concept of Appraisal theory is that speakers of a language use evaluative resources "for negotiating our social relationships, by telling our listeners or readers how we feel about things and people (in a word, what our attitudes are)" (Martin & Rose, 2003:19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The metafunctional nature of this theory not only provides a systematic means for differentiating interpersonal meaning from ideational and textual meanings, but also for exploring how they relate to each other. Within SFL, Appraisal offers the theorization of interpersonal meaning choices in discourse (see Martin, 2000;Martin & Rose, 2003, 2007Hood, 2004;Hood & Martin, 2005;Martin & White, 2005). A central concept of Appraisal theory is that speakers of a language use evaluative resources "for negotiating our social relationships, by telling our listeners or readers how we feel about things and people (in a word, what our attitudes are)" (Martin & Rose, 2003:19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of analysis of this study deals with one of the Appraisal systems outlined by these authors -ENGAGEMENT, which includes "all the resources by which the textual or authorial voice is positioned intersubjectively" (White, 2001:14). Though previous studies have focused on the research genres following the framework of Appraisal (see Hood, 2004;Hood & Martin, 2005), or on the specific system of ENGAGE-MENT but in other non-academic genres (see Miller, 2004), to our knowledge, no research has been conducted using grant proposals written by NNESs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También interesa analizar cómo funcionan la apreciación, particularmente la construcción de juicio, la gradación y el foco en el discurso de las disciplinas así como en diferentes pasos o secciones de los géneros en cuestión (Hood & Martin, 2005). Además de otros recursos léxico-gramaticales en juego, será de interés atender a algunos Temas interpersonales que tienen una función en este aspecto.…”
Section: El Desafío Actualunclassified
“…As Coffin has shown, explicit evaluation tends to be strategically placed in prospective or retrospective points of textual prominence, and propagated through quantification and intensification (as in academic discourse in general; see Hood, 2010). Achugar (2008) and (Oteíza 2006(Oteíza , 2009a develop this perspective for Spanish; for the graduation resources used to propagate prosodies of attitude see Hood and Martin (2005). Importantly for purposes of this paper, history is not just about what happened in the past; it is also about how we evaluate what happened.…”
Section: History Discourse: An Sfl Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%