2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12207-020-09376-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inviting Scientific Discourse on Traumatic Dissociation: Progress Made and Obstacles to Further Resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it should be noted that the present study does not examine the socio‐cognitive or “fantasy” model explaining dissociation (Giesbrecht et al, 2008; Spanos, 1994), which is considered as a rival theory to the trauma model (Dalenberg et al, 2014; Kluemper & Dalenberg, 2014; Lynn et al, 2014), as it concerns the veracity of trauma reports by dissociative individuals which is outside of the scope of the present investigation. Acknowledging this debate is important as critical views towards the trauma theory have crucial implications for patients suffering from dissociative disorders (Leonard et al, 2005; Loewenstein, 2018) or those recalling past trauma (Dalenberg et al, 2020), but our sample characteristics and data collection design are not suitable to contribute to the trauma versus fantasy issue. Interested readers are referred to Dalenberg et al (2020) for an updated review of what is currently agreed versus debated between trauma researchers and their critics.…”
Section: The Path To Dissociative Experiences: a Direct Comparison Of Different Etiological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, it should be noted that the present study does not examine the socio‐cognitive or “fantasy” model explaining dissociation (Giesbrecht et al, 2008; Spanos, 1994), which is considered as a rival theory to the trauma model (Dalenberg et al, 2014; Kluemper & Dalenberg, 2014; Lynn et al, 2014), as it concerns the veracity of trauma reports by dissociative individuals which is outside of the scope of the present investigation. Acknowledging this debate is important as critical views towards the trauma theory have crucial implications for patients suffering from dissociative disorders (Leonard et al, 2005; Loewenstein, 2018) or those recalling past trauma (Dalenberg et al, 2020), but our sample characteristics and data collection design are not suitable to contribute to the trauma versus fantasy issue. Interested readers are referred to Dalenberg et al (2020) for an updated review of what is currently agreed versus debated between trauma researchers and their critics.…”
Section: The Path To Dissociative Experiences: a Direct Comparison Of Different Etiological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging this debate is important as critical views towards the trauma theory have crucial implications for patients suffering from dissociative disorders (Leonard et al, 2005; Loewenstein, 2018) or those recalling past trauma (Dalenberg et al, 2020), but our sample characteristics and data collection design are not suitable to contribute to the trauma versus fantasy issue. Interested readers are referred to Dalenberg et al (2020) for an updated review of what is currently agreed versus debated between trauma researchers and their critics.…”
Section: The Path To Dissociative Experiences: a Direct Comparison Of Different Etiological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is troubling and painful to acknowledge how common and devastating trauma is, especially chronic childhood abuse. Subconscious protective mechanisms can take over to deny the reality of such abuse (in a similar way as denying racism, the Holocaust, or global warming 3 ) and to believe that DID is a factitious disorder, as stated by the fantasy model. 1 However, it becomes increasingly apparent that severe childhood abuse, neglect and maltreatment are part of many psychiatric disorders and of our society.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it was found that, “Dissociativity correlated with symptom over-reporting in the student samples, but not in the clinical sample (emphasis added, p. 165, Merckelbach et al, 2015 ). Merckelbach, Boskovic, Pesy, Dalsklev, and Lynn ( 2017 ) subsequently suggested that the correlation between SIMS scores and dissociation could be due to many SIMS items overlapping with trauma-related symptoms although this conclusion is often overlooked by those who argue that those high dissociation over-report their symptoms (see discussion of these omissions in Dalenberg, Brand, Loewenstein, Frewen, & Spiegel, 2020 ).…”
Section: Symptom Exaggeration Feigning and Trauma’s Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%