2013
DOI: 10.4279/pip.050007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invited review: Graphite and its hidden superconductivity

Abstract: We review experimental results, from transport to magnetization measurements, on different graphite samples, from bulk oriented graphite, thin graphite films to transmission electron microscope lamellae, that indicate the existence of granular superconductivity at temperatures above 100 K. The accumulated evidence speaks for a localization of the superconducting phase(s) at certain interfaces embedded in semiconducting crystalline regions with Bernal stacking order.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional evidence was then sought by plotting the difference of the two magnetization signals (mFC-mZFC) following the method reported by Scheike et al [7,8]. These analyses revealed a non-zero trend in conditions of large field values of 5000 Oe and 10000 Oe [35][36][37]. This observation seems to confirm the complex nature of the signal shown in figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additional evidence was then sought by plotting the difference of the two magnetization signals (mFC-mZFC) following the method reported by Scheike et al [7,8]. These analyses revealed a non-zero trend in conditions of large field values of 5000 Oe and 10000 Oe [35][36][37]. This observation seems to confirm the complex nature of the signal shown in figure 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Furthermore, no significant overlap between the FC and ZFC signals was observed, despite the used high fields values (i.e. significant overlap would be expected for a standard ferromagnetic component for applied fields above the H saturation [35][36][37]). Additional evidence was then sought by plotting the difference of the two magnetization signals (mFC-mZFC) following the method reported by Scheike et al [7,8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high fields increase of the TH is not compatible with any known magnetic order in carbon-based ferromagnetic Finally, magnetization measurements done on bulk highly oriented pyrolytic graphite samples of high grade with interfaces, see Section III, show similar behavior as for the water-treated graphite powder, in contrast to a bulk HOPG sample without or less density of interfaces [8]. Several others experimental studies partially reviewed in [17,18] indicate that superconductivity is embedded in certain interfaces of the graphite structure. Structural evidence for the existence of interfaces is presented in the next section.…”
Section: Magnetization Measurements On Graphite Powdersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Commentary on "Graphite and its hidden superconductivity" E. M. Forgan 1 * I write this comment on the article by Esquinazi [1] as an expert on superconductivity but not as an expert on graphite. I should also mention that in 1986, a student asked me what I thought about a paper written by Bednorz & Muller in Z. Phys.…”
Section: Issn 1852-4249mentioning
confidence: 99%