2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1503.01595
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Invisible $K_L$ decays as a probe of new physics

S. N. Gninenko,
N. V. Krasnikov

Abstract: The decay KL → invisible has never been experimentally tested. In the Standard Model (SM) its branching ratio for the decay into two neutrinos is helicity suppressed and predicted to be Br(KL → ν ν) 10 −10 . We consider several natural extensions of the SM, such as two-Higgs-doublet (2HDM), 2HDM and light scalar, and mirror dark matter models, those main feature is that they allow to avoid the helicity suppression factor and lead to an enhanced Br(KL → invisible). For the decay KL → ν ν the smallness of the ne… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the SM, this process is predominantly due to s → dν ν arising from Z-penguin and box diagrams with up-type quarks and the W boson in the loops [1], the neutrino pair (ν ν) being undetected. In the presence of NP, this SM contribution could be altered [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], and there might be invisible nonstandard states which are light enough and have sd couplings to give rise to new s → d / E channels [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the SM, this process is predominantly due to s → dν ν arising from Z-penguin and box diagrams with up-type quarks and the W boson in the loops [1], the neutrino pair (ν ν) being undetected. In the presence of NP, this SM contribution could be altered [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], and there might be invisible nonstandard states which are light enough and have sd couplings to give rise to new s → d / E channels [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 where we see that that a heavy neutrino could increase Br(K L → νν) up to 1.2 × 10 −10 . Unfortunately this falls short of the of NA64 expected sensitivity to this decay 37 where this decay could be searched for by using K L produced from a K + beam hitting an active target. This motivates the study of other set-ups which could be sensitive to this decay or similar invisible decays.…”
Section: "Invisible Decay" K L → ννmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…( 4) and (5). Specifically, we will make the 4) GeV and M A = 1.25 (15) GeV, which are in line with the commonly used parametrization in experimental studies of hyperon semileptonic decays [20][21][22][23][24]. Moreover, for the Ω − decay we apply the modification…”
Section: A Baryon Decaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, φ and φ always appear together in their interactions with SM quarks at low energies. Scenarios where such nonstandard bosons have ds couplings that contribute to kaon processes have been addressed before in the literature under specific NP contexts [12][13][14][15]. Here we pursue a model-independent approach, starting from the most general effective Lagrangian that satisfies SM gauge invariance and contains operators describing dsφφ interactions at leading order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%