2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01138.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investors’ Reliance on Analysts’ Stock Recommendations and Mitigating Mechanisms for Potential Overreliance*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extant literature in accounting and finance regards SS analysts as important information intermediaries who provide relevant knowledge to decision makers such as investors, FMs, and brokers, primarily in the form of earnings forecasts, buy/sell recommendations, and target prices (Schipper 1991;Ramnath et al 2008;Bradshaw 2011). In other words, analyst outputs are presumed to matter for their informational content (Stickel 1995;Womack 1996;Barber et al 2001;Brav and Lehavy 2003;Asquith et al 2005;Kelly et al 2012;Twedt and Rees 2012;Huang et al 2014;De Franco et al 2015, among others). This initial inference was also supported by a systematic survey of the literature we conducted.…”
Section: Problematizing Extant Economistic Literature On Analystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant literature in accounting and finance regards SS analysts as important information intermediaries who provide relevant knowledge to decision makers such as investors, FMs, and brokers, primarily in the form of earnings forecasts, buy/sell recommendations, and target prices (Schipper 1991;Ramnath et al 2008;Bradshaw 2011). In other words, analyst outputs are presumed to matter for their informational content (Stickel 1995;Womack 1996;Barber et al 2001;Brav and Lehavy 2003;Asquith et al 2005;Kelly et al 2012;Twedt and Rees 2012;Huang et al 2014;De Franco et al 2015, among others). This initial inference was also supported by a systematic survey of the literature we conducted.…”
Section: Problematizing Extant Economistic Literature On Analystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet we know relatively little about the background and knowledge of individual investors. While a small number of studies access investor groups (e.g., via investment clubs or associations, such as in Kelly et al 2012), many such studies utilize convenience samples of graduate business student participants in experiments. Thus, the current research addresses two broad questions: (i) how the background and knowledge of individual investors with different types of investment experience differ from noninvestors and (ii) how the range of individual investors' financial literacy skills (that is, their knowledge of fundamental financial concepts) impacts their investment-related judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants’ perceived investment potential was tested through three questions ( Kelly et al, 2012 ; Kelly and Seow, 2016 ): (1) In your opinion, how attractive is Company X’s stock as a medium- to long-term investment? (2) In your opinion, what is the potential of Company X’s stock price to appreciate over the next 3 years?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%