2006
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.945296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investors Do Respond to Poor Mutual Fund Performance: Evidence from Inflows and Outflows

Abstract: We examine the relation between mutual fund performance and gross flows for a large sample of actively managed U.S. mutual funds. Unlike previous studies that have only examined periods of generally increasing net flows, our sample includes periods of both increasing and decreasing net flows. We find that outflows are related to performance, with investors withdrawing money from poor performers. We also find that outflows and inflows respond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(38 reference statements)
4
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, when only accounting for net flows, the punishment provided to the worst performers is not in sync with the reward given to the best performers. However, once I separate purchases and redemptions, my results based on the purchases of winners and the redemptions of losers are consistent with O'Neal (2004), Ivković and Weisbenner (2007) and Cashman et al (2006). Specifically, when I control for raw performance, I find no evidence that funds in the bottom decile see fewer redemptions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In other words, when only accounting for net flows, the punishment provided to the worst performers is not in sync with the reward given to the best performers. However, once I separate purchases and redemptions, my results based on the purchases of winners and the redemptions of losers are consistent with O'Neal (2004), Ivković and Weisbenner (2007) and Cashman et al (2006). Specifically, when I control for raw performance, I find no evidence that funds in the bottom decile see fewer redemptions.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Consistent with prior aggregate fund flow research, he finds that past winners see increased purchases; however, unlike previous studies, he reports that poor performers are, in fact, punished with increased redemptions. Subsequently, Ivković and Weisbenner (2007) and Cashman et al (2006), who focus on the determinants of fund flows, also separate purchases and redemptions to show increased purchases to past winners coupled with increased redemptions from poor performing funds – albeit for different reasons. Specifically, Ivković and Weisbenner find that while inflows are driven by purchases that chase relative performance, outflows are driven by absolute performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Cashman et al (2012) extend the full sample of US domestic equity funds to 2007, and find significant sensitivity of monthly redemptions to bad performance, enough that monthly net flows show no convexity . Spiegel & Zhang (2013) are also skeptical of convexity and argue that it is an artifact of heterogeneity between funds that individually face linear flows.…”
Section: Relation Of Flows To Past Performancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…As interest in studying the flows from investors and their deployment by fund managers grew, some scholars obtained data on 'gross' flows at the fund level rather than infer them from changes in net asset value. Cashman, Deli, Nardari, & Villupuram (2008) identify both inflows and outflows at the fund level and conclude that current investors punish poor performance by increasing (decreasing) their outflows (inflows). Ivkovich and Weisbenner (2008) use mutual fund trading data and find that inflows are related to relative performance while outflows are related to absolute performance.…”
Section: Flow-related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 98%