2017
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2017.1311226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investor protection and country-level governance: cross-country empirical panel data evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different studies report that effective countrylevel governance is an essential driver of economic and social development (Rachisan et al, 2017). It was found that the business environment is significantly influenced by country-level governance.…”
Section: Public Interest Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different studies report that effective countrylevel governance is an essential driver of economic and social development (Rachisan et al, 2017). It was found that the business environment is significantly influenced by country-level governance.…”
Section: Public Interest Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies explored CLCG with its relation to accounting, finance, and/or auditing issues (e.g. Avram et al, 2015;Hillier et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2014;Pindado et al, 2015;Sayed & Chawla, 2017;Thenmozhi & Narayanan, 2016), economic growth (Boţa- Avram et al, 2018), FDI (Agyemang et al, 2019), ethical behaviour of firms (Agyemang et al, 2015) and investors' protection (Rachisan et al, 2017), entrepreneurship (Groşanu et al, 2015), disclosure and compliance (Ernstberger & Grüning, 2013;Sarhan et al, 2019) firm value (Saona & San Martín, 2016) and financial analysis (Seifert & Gonenc, 2018) (See Table 1). Groşanu et al (2015) examined "the influence of country-level governance on business environment and entrepreneurship" in different states over the period of 2007up to 2012.…”
Section: Theoretical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the characteristics of the institutional setting, it has been widely argued that it has an impact as a governance system on the discretionary capacity of managers to engage in real activities manipulation. Specifically, improvements in regulation have dramatically changed the managerial behaviour concerning misreporting of financial information (Rachisan, Bota-Avram, & Grosanu, 2017). For instance, Cohen et al (2008) stated that managers have shifted their method of earnings management from accrual-based earnings managements to real activities manipulation after the passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (S.O.X.)…”
Section: Institutional System and Real Activities Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, they inferred that the institutional setting asymmetrically affects the earnings manipulation based on the firm-level governance systems. Rachisan et al (2017), Demirguç-Kunt and Maksimovic (1998) and Demirg€ uç-Kunt, Laeven, and Levine (2004) asserted that legal enforcement and efficient regulatory systems are associated with lower levels of corruption, which make the financial system perform with much less friction. Consequently, we can derive out of these arguments that the characteristics of the legal system also determine the way the executives use their discretionary capacity to manage the accounting earnings.…”
Section: Institutional System and Real Activities Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies in the literature, both the oldest and the newest, focus on the macroeconomic approach of competitiveness (Ketels, 2016;Porter, 1990). At this level, there is a link between governance, investor protection, entrepreneurship and economic performance (Rachisan et al, 2017, Grosanu et al, 2015. From the macroeconomic perspective, competitiveness is considered in the literature as the ability of a company to design, build and sell products and services superior to those offered by the competition, (D'Cruz, 1992), and the ability to accumulate sustainable growth and profitability (Cetindamar & Kilitcioglu, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%