2017
DOI: 10.17016/feds.2017.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment Responses to Trade Liberalization: Evidence from U.S. Industries and Establishments

Abstract: This paper examines the eect of a change in U.S. trade policy on the domestic investment of U.S. manufacturers. Using a dierence-in-dierences identication strategy, we nd that industries more exposed to reductions in import tari uncertainty exhibit relative declines in investment after the change in trade policy. Within industries, we nd that this relationship is concentrated among establishments with low initial levels of labor productivity, capital intensity and skill intensity. For plants with high initial … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, financially constrained firms experience substantial declines in annual sales when subject to tariff reductions. In line with Pierce and Schott (2018), we also find that market exit is more pronounced among financially constrained firms. Our estimates suggest that a tariff reduction for these firms is associated with a significant increase in the probability of leaving the market.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore, financially constrained firms experience substantial declines in annual sales when subject to tariff reductions. In line with Pierce and Schott (2018), we also find that market exit is more pronounced among financially constrained firms. Our estimates suggest that a tariff reduction for these firms is associated with a significant increase in the probability of leaving the market.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…One possible explanation for the baseline results is that high-gap industries were receiving higher de-facto protectionism from China via the uncertainty generated by the trade policy status. There is in fact evidence that these industries suffered in terms of employment and investment relatively more when the uncertainty was eliminated in 2001 (see Pierce and Schott (2016), Handley and Limão (2017) and Pierce and Schott (2018)). This would have translated into higher expected cash flows for high-gap sectors, and thus in higher average returns between 1990 and 2001.…”
Section: Protection From Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the decrease in investment in enterprises whose products compete with Chinese goods coincides with the timing of the measure, but this had little impact on those companies that initially had a higher level of productivity and cost-effectiveness. The authors argue that this is due to the introduction of technical changes and other factors that lead to the creation of better products [Pierce, Schott, 2018]. These findings are of great interest for the current increase in American duties on Chinese goods and goods from a number of other countries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%