2019
DOI: 10.1108/maj-10-2017-1689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment in internal auditing and governance characteristics

Abstract: Purpose Based on 3,775 firm-year observations from 2009 to 2013 using publicly available disclosure data for Korean listed firms, this study examines whether and how firm-level governance characteristics are associated with investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statutory internal auditors. Design/methodology/approach The authors investigate the association between governance characteristics and investment in internal auditing proxied by compensation and the number of statu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ismael and Roberts (2018) examine the UK setting using data collected from annual reports of 332 non-financial companies listed on Use of in-house internal audit functions the London Stock Exchange and find that key determinants of IAF use include firm size, level of internal risks and the presence of an effective AC. Park et al (2019) find that investment in IAF is linked to greater ownership by large shareholders and with a higher proportion of outside directors. In sum, in-house IAF use therefore may be influenced by factors such as corporate governance attributes, the firm's ability to fund in-house IAF use (including firm size and access to capital) and where the firm regards an in-house IAF to be an important internal resource to manage risk and complexity (as further discussed in the following paragraphs).…”
Section: Use Of In-house Internal Audit Functionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ismael and Roberts (2018) examine the UK setting using data collected from annual reports of 332 non-financial companies listed on Use of in-house internal audit functions the London Stock Exchange and find that key determinants of IAF use include firm size, level of internal risks and the presence of an effective AC. Park et al (2019) find that investment in IAF is linked to greater ownership by large shareholders and with a higher proportion of outside directors. In sum, in-house IAF use therefore may be influenced by factors such as corporate governance attributes, the firm's ability to fund in-house IAF use (including firm size and access to capital) and where the firm regards an in-house IAF to be an important internal resource to manage risk and complexity (as further discussed in the following paragraphs).…”
Section: Use Of In-house Internal Audit Functionsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A need for a strong internal governance mechanism stems from the necessity to align organisational behaviour so that firms continue to maximise shareholder value, thereby reducing agency costs. Park et al (2019) find that a higher proportion of outside directors is linked to IAF investment and conclude that demand for monitoring can drive investment in an IAF. A review of literature provides some evidence that AC use is associated with IAF use (Hay et al, 2017).…”
Section: Agency and Resource-based Theorymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Sekaran and Bougie (2016) deem the questionnaire the most crucial and effective technique for gathering data. Moreover, Oppenheim (2000) highlights one of the benefits of using a questionnaire: letting participants independently contemplate their responses and answers more instantaneously than what is produced in interviews. Furthermore, Saunders et al (2019) suggest that a questionnaire survey makes it possible to collect substantial information from a targeted population sample.…”
Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, more research is necessary, as stated by many scholars (Alrawad et al 2023;Apreku-Djan et al 2022;Benli and Celayir 2014;Drogalas and Siopi 2017;Endaya and Hanefah 2016;Grima et al 2023;Mujalli and Almgrashi 2020). For instance, Grima et al (2023) andPark et al (2019) point out insufficient empirical work has been conducted on internal auditing. Similarly, Coetzee and Lubbe (2014), Lois et al (2021), Turetken et al (2020), andAbidin (2017) have specified the necessity for more research to empirically test the factors affecting RBIA implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A need exists for further investigations in this area [54], [95], [65]. For example, [106] highlighted the lack of studies focusing on internal auditing. Similarly, [109] and [59] emphasized the necessity for additional empirical studies to examine the factors influencing internal audit functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%