1990
DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(90)90003-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investment horizon and beta coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in which m is the module, and m is 4.25; z 1 is the tooth number of the pinion, and z 1 is 13; z 2 is the tooth number of the rack, and z 2 is 245. Substitute equations (10) and (11) into equation 8, we can obtain the normal load P based on the Hertz contact theory…”
Section: Construct the Wear Model Of The High-lift Device Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…in which m is the module, and m is 4.25; z 1 is the tooth number of the pinion, and z 1 is 13; z 2 is the tooth number of the rack, and z 2 is 245. Substitute equations (10) and (11) into equation 8, we can obtain the normal load P based on the Hertz contact theory…”
Section: Construct the Wear Model Of The High-lift Device Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An et al 10 assumed that the correlated random variables follow the multidimensional normal and lognormal distributions, and use Bayesian statistics method to estimate the wear coefficient and predict the wear volume in the revolute joint. For the sake of convenience, Lin and Chen 11 adopt the assumption of independence in their research. However, in the above approximate methods, there exist obvious disadvantages: the assumption of independence may lead to large errors in some cases; different types of multidimensional joint distribution assumptions can cause different Bayesian updating results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of other authors in this field either confirmed the conclusion drawn from Levy's research or contradicted it. It is difficult to mention here the works of all the authors, but as an example the following works can be indicated: Eubank and Zumwalt (1979); Chen (1982); Alexander and Benson (1982); Fisher and Kamin (1985); Brennan and Copeland (1988); Lin and Chen (1990); Clarkson and Thompson (1990); Sercu et al (2008); Berger (2013). In these works, beta parameter was also under consideration in the context of issues such as: length of the estimation sample, portfolio size, company size, liquidity of trading shares of the company on the stock exchange, frequency of measurement of the rate of return, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%