2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investing in schools: capital spending, facility conditions, and student achievement

Abstract: 2016-11-03T14:11:40

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
47
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
47
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While CPTED offers promising results for improving school environments, the cost of renovating existing schools to meet ideal CPTED standards in a comprehensive manner would exceed most school districts’ budget allowances (Schneider et al, ). Further, inequities in the funding of CPTED improvements might be disproportional, especially to students who come from families with limited political, social, or economic capital (Filardo, Bar, Cheng, Ulsoy, & Allen, ; Martorell, Stange, & McFarlin, ). Thus, there are significant systemic funding barriers to overcome in implementing CPTED in schools.…”
Section: Cptedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While CPTED offers promising results for improving school environments, the cost of renovating existing schools to meet ideal CPTED standards in a comprehensive manner would exceed most school districts’ budget allowances (Schneider et al, ). Further, inequities in the funding of CPTED improvements might be disproportional, especially to students who come from families with limited political, social, or economic capital (Filardo, Bar, Cheng, Ulsoy, & Allen, ; Martorell, Stange, & McFarlin, ). Thus, there are significant systemic funding barriers to overcome in implementing CPTED in schools.…”
Section: Cptedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we estimate specifications similar toCard and Payne's (2002) closely related analysis of earlier SFRs (AppendixTable A3), estimated SFR effects are slightly larger but imprecise, and well within the earlier confidence intervals. Where Card and Payne find that total revenues rise by about $0.50 per extra $1 in state aid, our estimates indicate much more stickiness for the recent reforms.23 Using a different research design, Sims (2011b) finds effects of SFRs on teacher pay.24 Neilson and Zimmerman (2014) find that school reconstruction causes increases in student achievement.Cellini et al (2010) andMartorell, Stange, and McFarlin (2015) fail to find significant effects, but each study is under-powered to detect effects of plausible magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not have information on how exactly buildings were improved after receiving the extra funding; therefore we do not know what are the underlying causal mechanism linking better infrastructures to test score gains. As Martorell et al (2016) outlined in their contribution, there might be several, potential mechanisms at play such as the improvement in temperature control; modernization in infrastructure to support the latest technology or labs for science education; infrastructure enhancements to avoid chronic distractions and reduce the number of missed school days. Low-quality facilities could also undermine effort, especially of low-achieving students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neilson & Zimmerman (2014) find strong evidence that school construction programs led, among other outcomes, to sustained gains in reading scores for elementary and middle school students. Yet, Martorell et al (2016), who focuses more specifically on school facility investments, find little evidence that spending on facilities generate improvements in student achievement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%