2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on the applicability of hydrostatic bearing technology in a rotary energy recovery device through CFD simulation and validating experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure-based solver is chosen for the numerical analysis in this study, and the Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations (SIMPLE) algorithm is used to obtain a converged solution and the others are default. The residual convergence criteria is assumed to be achieved [29] when: (i) the net flow rate of fluid entering and leaving the model is less than 7.5 × 10 −6 L/min; (ii) the averaged force of the wall S reaches a stable level.…”
Section: Cfd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure-based solver is chosen for the numerical analysis in this study, and the Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure Linked Equations (SIMPLE) algorithm is used to obtain a converged solution and the others are default. The residual convergence criteria is assumed to be achieved [29] when: (i) the net flow rate of fluid entering and leaving the model is less than 7.5 × 10 −6 L/min; (ii) the averaged force of the wall S reaches a stable level.…”
Section: Cfd Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering cavitation, Yu et al (2019) used CFD to study the performance of hydrostatic bearings under different groove shapes. Using FLUENT to simulate the characteristics of the support bearing on the energy recovery device, Xu et al (2016) found that the support force varied linearly with the supply pressure and film thickness and obtained the optimal film thickness. Focusing on the machining error, Cui et al (2018) combined the dynamic grid technology and CFD software to study the static pressure porous bearing, and they determined the impact of inaccurate machining on running accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite difference method (FDM) is proved to be a practical and reliable method to resolve the Reynolds equation by J Li and others. [12][13][14][15] study. Based on DA Bompos and Nikolakopoulos's 16 calculation, most hydrostatic bearings are nonlinear over damping systems and periodic cutting will influence the displacement of machining point.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%