1996
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1996.410.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on Sweet Cherry Effective Pollination Period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third approach, described by Ughini and Roversi [ 12 ], begins by isolating several branches prior to bloom. Isolation bags are then removed in daily intervals, and the number of flowers per shoot as well as the number of open flowers and the final fruit set, are recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A third approach, described by Ughini and Roversi [ 12 ], begins by isolating several branches prior to bloom. Isolation bags are then removed in daily intervals, and the number of flowers per shoot as well as the number of open flowers and the final fruit set, are recorded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results, a fruit set curve can be created, and the EPP can be estimated. The main difference between the Ughini and Roversi [ 12 ] method and the sequential pollination of emasculated and isolated flowers is that the pollination event depends on natural orchard conditions, and no emasculation or artificial hand-pollination is involved. Furthermore, the EPP is not based on the longevity of a single flower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of factors can affect fruit set in sweet cherry. Many studies have shown that fruit set in sweet cherry depends on the genotype (Roversi et al 1984), self-incompatibility, stigmatic receptivity (Ughini and Roversi 1996) and pollen vectors such as bees (Lane 1979), as well as weather conditions and temperatures during pollination (Guerrero-P. et al 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%