2012
DOI: 10.1177/1350650112459128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on solid particle erosion behaviour of ferritic steels, austenitic steel and low carbon steel and correlation of erosion data with erosion model

Abstract: Solid particle erosion behaviour of ferritic stainless steels AISI 444 and 439, austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 and low carbon steel AISI 1010 were investigated. Erosion studies of these materials were conducted at room temperature using silica sand of size 150-300 mm. The influence of erosion rates due to different velocities (40-85 m/s) and impingement angle (15-90 ) were experimentally analysed. Erosion efficiency values (0.7-3.6%) indicate that erosion occurs by lip or platelet formation in the materia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…304 austenitic stainless steel shows better performance but the parameters were less extreme compared to the present study [29]. In another study on 304 carried by A. Azad et al [30] with increased velocity and at normal angle of impingement, the erosion rate was higher compared to high manganese nitrogen stabilized austenitic stainless steel. Comparison of erosion rate of less expensive high manganese nitrogen stabilized (Ni-free) austenitic stainless steel with those of expensive nickel containing conventional stainless steel at different impact angle and exposure temperature clearly shows that the present alloy performs better and could be replacement of the existing 316L stainless steel.…”
Section: Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 40%
“…304 austenitic stainless steel shows better performance but the parameters were less extreme compared to the present study [29]. In another study on 304 carried by A. Azad et al [30] with increased velocity and at normal angle of impingement, the erosion rate was higher compared to high manganese nitrogen stabilized austenitic stainless steel. Comparison of erosion rate of less expensive high manganese nitrogen stabilized (Ni-free) austenitic stainless steel with those of expensive nickel containing conventional stainless steel at different impact angle and exposure temperature clearly shows that the present alloy performs better and could be replacement of the existing 316L stainless steel.…”
Section: Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 40%