2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(01)00119-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on hard turning with minimal cutting fluid application (HTMF) and its comparison with dry and wet turning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
114
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In MQL, cooling occurs due to convective and evaporative mode of heat transfer and thus is more effective than conventional wet cooling in which cooling occurs due to convective heat transfer only. In addition, cutting fluid droplets by virtue of their high velocity penetrates the blanket of vapor formed and provides more effective heat transfer than wet cooling (Varadarajan et al, 2002). However, according to Astakhov, 2008 aerosols do not acts as lubricants or boundary lubricants as they do not have access to the tool-chip and tool-work-piece interfaces due to too low penetration ability.…”
Section: Minimum Quantity Lubricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In MQL, cooling occurs due to convective and evaporative mode of heat transfer and thus is more effective than conventional wet cooling in which cooling occurs due to convective heat transfer only. In addition, cutting fluid droplets by virtue of their high velocity penetrates the blanket of vapor formed and provides more effective heat transfer than wet cooling (Varadarajan et al, 2002). However, according to Astakhov, 2008 aerosols do not acts as lubricants or boundary lubricants as they do not have access to the tool-chip and tool-work-piece interfaces due to too low penetration ability.…”
Section: Minimum Quantity Lubricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MQL has been successfully applied in various machining operations such as turning (Dhar et al, 2006a), drilling (Kelly and Cotterell, 2002), milling (Kishawy et al, 2005) and grinding (Sadeghi et al, 2009). Applications of MQL has resulted in better tool life, improved surface finish, better chip forms and reduced cutting forces (Varadarajan et al, 2002;Khan et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure at the Fluid applicator was kept at 100 MPa, the rate of fluid application at 2 ml/min, the frequency of pulsing at 500 pulses/min. 23 Three different inserts were used in the experimentation and each experiment lasted for 2 minutes. Amplitude of tool vibration was measured by using a piezoelectric vibrometer pickup mounted at the top of the tool holder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varadarajan, Philip &Ramamoorthy [10]performed turning trials using AISI 4340 steel as work material and reported lowest temperature using MQL in comparison with dry turning and flooding, under both low and high cutting speeds. The results are explained by the fact that cutting fluid droplets are capable of reaching the interface, making heat transfer more effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%