2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on generalized Hjorth's parameters for machine performance degradation assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be confirmed again from figure 26 that kurtosis cannot track the evolution of the rolling bearing fault. The above description is consistent with the viewpoint of [7]. In the implementation process of the above four cases, some results can be further analyzed and explained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This can be confirmed again from figure 26 that kurtosis cannot track the evolution of the rolling bearing fault. The above description is consistent with the viewpoint of [7]. In the implementation process of the above four cases, some results can be further analyzed and explained.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…(2) Based on the assessment curve of case 1, case 2, and case 3 in this paper, it can be found that the characteristics and laws of components' degradation are not strictly monotonically increasing. The assessment curve in existing [6][7][8][9]14] also exhibits this phenomenon. The reason may lie in that there are three nonlinear mappings: One is the mapping between defect growth patterns and runtime, the other is the mapping between defect size and fault features, and the third is the mapping between fault features and the PDA indicator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations