1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(90)90427-o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations on ceramic materials for fusion technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12,13,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] When considering the irradiation effects on the strength of SiC it is important to differentiate between the stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric ceramics. Forms of SiC include reaction bonded, sintered, pressureless sintered, SiC converted from reaction of graphite with molten Si or silicon monoxide, SiC derived from polymer precursors, and materials formed from the decomposition of gasses such as methyl or ethyltrichlorosilane (MTS or ETS.)…”
Section: Monolithic Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[12,13,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] When considering the irradiation effects on the strength of SiC it is important to differentiate between the stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric ceramics. Forms of SiC include reaction bonded, sintered, pressureless sintered, SiC converted from reaction of graphite with molten Si or silicon monoxide, SiC derived from polymer precursors, and materials formed from the decomposition of gasses such as methyl or ethyltrichlorosilane (MTS or ETS.)…”
Section: Monolithic Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all cases, the values are for Weibull's mean with error bars indicating ±1 Weibull's standard deviation. However, while the work of Dienst [28,33] references the use of ten samples per condition and gives Weibull's mean and modulus, no standard deviation was given. The dotted lines of the figure are approximations of this standard deviation as calculated using Weibull data provided by Dienst [28,33].…”
Section: Monolithic Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since comparative cryogenic data from the same investigator are not available, the comparative thermal conductivity of AIN, A1203, and MgA120q above ambient temperature is presented in Figure 3.3.3 for two forms of AIN: hot isostatically pressed (HIP) and commercial, sintered materials [Dienst et al, 1990] .…”
Section: Specific Heatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A handbook value for the specific heat at 298 K is 800 J/(kg-K) [Moore, 1991]. conductivity data on less pure crystals and data on ceramic specimens [Slack, 1973] .Since comparative cryogenic data from the same investigator are not available, the comparative thermal conductivity of AIN, AI 2 O 3 , and MgAl 204 , above ambient temperature is presented in Figure 3.3.3 for two forms of AIN: hot isostatically pressed (HIP) and commercial, sintered materials [Dienst et al, 1990].The lower conductivity of the HIP grade may be due to a 5% AI 2 O 3 content, but even so, the conductivity is substantially above the conductivities of AI 2 O 3 and MgAl 204 . Aluminum nitride is known as a high thermal conductivity ceramic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%