1969
DOI: 10.1299/jsme1958.12.774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of the Shock Tubes : (Part 1, The Effects of Tube Diameter on the Tube Performance)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The finite opening time of the diaphragm can affect the shock formation distance and trajectory [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and, in general, slow-opening diaphragms cause the peak in axial shock trajectory to occur further downstream [22]. The resulting slope of the attenuating shock downstream of the peak Mach number can be steeper than predicted assuming viscous effects alone [23].…”
Section: Shock Tube and Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finite opening time of the diaphragm can affect the shock formation distance and trajectory [21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and, in general, slow-opening diaphragms cause the peak in axial shock trajectory to occur further downstream [22]. The resulting slope of the attenuating shock downstream of the peak Mach number can be steeper than predicted assuming viscous effects alone [23].…”
Section: Shock Tube and Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting slope of the attenuating shock downstream of the peak Mach number can be steeper than predicted assuming viscous effects alone [23]. Opening time/formation distance has been found to vary inversely with driver-todriven pressure difference, P 41 (i.e, P 4 -P,), and directly with diaphragm density, diaphragm thickness, ultimate stress of the diaphragm material, and shock tube diameter [24]. For the HPST, the shock formation distance and diaphragm opening time are not routinely measured, but these cited trends qualitatively support the observed test-to-test variation in the incident-shock attenuation.…”
Section: Shock Tube and Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical one-dimensional shock theory does not account for the effects of viscosity, heat conductivity, or diaphragm opening time when predicting shock wave strength and propagation speed in a shock tube [1]. As a result, it is insufficient to predict the acceleration and deceleration process that is observed experimentally in shock tubes [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it is insufficient to predict the acceleration and deceleration process that is observed experimentally in shock tubes [1][2][3]. Shock wave velocity measurements in shock tube experiments have been found to deviate from the classical one-dimensional shock theory, especially at early times near the diaphragm rupture location [1,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation