“…For example, Clostridiaceae , Flavobacteriaaceae , Turicibacteraceae , Anaerolinaceae , Actinomycetales and Synergistales (Fernandez et al ., ; Overmann, ; Jumas‐Bilak et al ., ; Ito et al ., ; Wang et al ., ), which were well known for their roles in the fermentation of macromolecular organic matter (lipid, cellulose, propionate, glucose, fatty acid and amino acid) into acetate, showed a higher abundance in the bacterial community of the sediment samples from LM area than HM area. Comamonadaceae and Pseudomonadaceae , which were known to be homo‐acetogens and could provide acetate for acetoclastic methanogens by consuming H 2 and CO 2 (Morrill et al ., ), were enriched in the sediment samples from LM area. In contrast, in the sediment samples from HM area, more than 31.9% of bacteria mainly belonged to the phylum of Bacteroidetes (Qiu et al ., ) and Proteobacteria such as Syntrophaceae (Briones et al ., ) and Syntrophorhabdaceae (Gray et al ., ), and are known to have a syntrophic relationship with hydrogenotrophic methanogens.…”