Investigations of Ignition Processes Using High Frequency Ignition

To meet the future requirements of fuel economy and exhaust emissions, high-efficiency gasoline engines tend to employ diluted combustion concepts along with intensified charge motion and stratified mixtures. Securing the ignition of such mixtures over the full engine operation range is challenging, because of the lowered mixture reactivity and increased discrepancy of stoichiometry. In recent years, increasing research efforts have been spending on innovations of ignition technologies to tackle the challenges. In this paper, the directions of ignition improvement are highlighted based on the fundamental understanding of the ignition mechanisms. The working principles of the primary types of advanced ignition systems are introduced; and relevant engine and combustion vessel test results are reviewed. The ignition systems are categorized as: (1) high-energy spark ignition, (2) pulsed nanosecond discharge ignition, (3) radio-frequency plasma ignition, (4) laser-induced plasma ignition, and (5) pre-chamber ignition. The advanced ignition systems are commented, regarding the ignition effectiveness and the implementation challenges, according to the literatures and the extensive empirical work at the authors’ laboratory.

Section: Multiple Sites and Ignition Volumementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Rf Corona Ignitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Future gasoline engine ignition: A review on advanced concepts

Zheng

2020

“…The test bench at the Institute of Internal Combustion Engines (IFKM) at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) is equipped with several measurement devices, as shown in [26,[37][38][39]: a Pierburg PLU 401 is used to measure the fuel consumption. The exhaust A/F ratio is measured using an ETAS LA4 Lambda Meter.…”

Section: Test Bench Setupmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of implementing large-scale charge motion, reducing hydraulic flow of the injector and increasing injection pressure on particle emissions of a GDI engine at WOT and boosted operation

Bertsch

Weidenlener

Dörnhöfer

et al. 2016

Gasoline direct injection (GDI) shows advantages compared with port fuel injection (PFI) regarding efficiency and specific power. Due to stricter regulations for fuel consumption (via the regulation of carbon dioxide), GDI engines are becoming increasingly favourable compared with PFI engines. Therefore the share of GDI engines, especially in combination with turbocharging, is increasing in most of the markets with CO 2 regulations. Challenging for GDI engines is the mixture formation process due to the short time between fuel injection and the start of combustion. Thus, the injector needs to provide a fine fuel atomization in a considerably short time. The generated spray pattern thereby interacts with the in-cylinder charge motion to generate an appropriate air-fuel mixture. Because of this challenging mixture formation process, the formation of soot in local fuel-rich areas is possible. Thus GDI engines emit more particles compared with PFI engines and need special attention on the mixture formation process. To understand the reasons for the increased particle number (PN) emissions, a project concerning the cause of particle emissions was started at Institute of Internal Combustion Engines (IFKM) in Karlsruhe in 2011. During the project, different causes for PN emissions were identified. This article discusses the possible reasons for particle emissions under high engine load and low engine speed and shows some possible solutions to reduce the emission of particles. Discussed possible solutions to enhance the mixture formation process are the generation of a large-scale charge motion (tumble and swirl), the reduction of the hydraulic flow of the multi-hole, solenoid-activated injector and an increase of the rail pressure up to 50 MPa. The reduction of the hydraulic flow and the increase of the injection pressure lead to smaller average droplets and thus to a faster evaporation. An implementation of a large-scale charge motion enhances the mixture formation process and leads to a reduction of the emitted PN concentration at high engine load. This is shown for wide open throttle (WOT) as well as for boosted operation. The reduction of the hydraulic flow of the injector by reducing the bore hole diameter at constant number of holes and spray targeting of the injector leads to smaller droplets. By increasing the injection pressure, the injection duration as well as the average droplet size can be reduced and leads to a better homogenization and a further reduced PN concentration.

“…Several different methods have been proposed to achieve stable lean well-mixed operation, such as high-energy ignition, multiple SI, plasma ignition, and microwave-assisted ignition. 3–5,10–14 These strategies have shown engine performance improvements in certain engine speed/load ranges by creating a larger effective flame kernel and/or a longer kernel lifetime. 11 There are also torch-ignition systems that utilize a pre-chamber to produce flame jets in the main combustion chamber.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of partial fuel stratification to enable stable ultra-lean deflagration-based Spark-Ignition engine operation with controlled end-gas autoignition of gasoline and E85

Zhang

Sjöberg

et al. 2019

Lean operation of Spark-Ignition engines can provide higher thermal efficiency compared to standard stoichiometric operation. However, for a homogeneous lean mixture, the associated reduction of flame speeds becomes an important issue from the perspective of robust ignition and fast flame spread throughout the charge. This study is focused on the use of a lean partial fuel stratification strategy that can stabilize the deflagration, while sufficiently fast combustion is ensured via the use of end-gas autoignition. The engine has a spray-guided Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition combustion system and was fueled with either a high-octane certification gasoline or E85. Partial fuel stratification was achieved using several fuel injections during the intake stroke in combination with a small pilot-injection concurrent with the Spark-Ignition. The results reveal that partial fuel stratification enables very stable combustion, offering higher thermal efficiency for parts of the load range in comparison to well-mixed lean and stoichiometric combustion. The heat release and flame imaging demonstrate that the combustion often has three distinct stages. The combustion of the pilot-injected fuel, ignited by the normal spark, acts as a “super igniter,” ensuring a very repeatable initiation of combustion, and flame incandescence reveals locally rich conditions. The second stage is mainly composed of blue flame propagation in a well-mixed lean mixture. The third stage is the compression autoignition of a well-mixed and typically very lean end-gas. The end-gas autoignition is critical for achieving high combustion efficiency, high thermal efficiency, and stable combustion. Partial fuel stratification enables very effective combustion-phasing control, which is critical for controlling the occurrence and intensity of end-gas autoignition. Comparing the gasoline and E85 fuels, it is noted that achieving end-gas autoignition for the higher octane E85 requires a more aggressive compression of the end-gas via the use of a more advanced combustion phasing or higher intake-air temperature.