2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.aeolia.2020.100662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations into the design of sand control fence for Gobi buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each phase is assumed as a continuous medium and wind phase and sand phase are filled with the whole flow field at the same time, and used momentum equations and continuous equations to solve each phase, and added k-ε turbulence model (turbulence intensity I=0.05, turbulence radius R=0.5). These equations (Xin et al, 2021;Li et al, 2022) are in following forms:…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each phase is assumed as a continuous medium and wind phase and sand phase are filled with the whole flow field at the same time, and used momentum equations and continuous equations to solve each phase, and added k-ε turbulence model (turbulence intensity I=0.05, turbulence radius R=0.5). These equations (Xin et al, 2021;Li et al, 2022) are in following forms:…”
Section: Mathematical Model and Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy of wind and sand prevention was greatest when the range of the sand barrier porosity was 30% to 50%. Secondly, height of sand barrier is also an important parameter affecting the effect of wind and sand prevention; (Dong et al, 2007;Li and Sherman, 2015) showed that vertical wind barriers of about 0.6-1.3 m were often used in areas with intense and sandstorms; (Cheng et al, 2016;Xin et al, 2021) proposed the effects of inclined insert-plate sand barrier height and slat Angle and wind velocity on sand control effectiveness and got its optimal height is 2.0 m−2.5 m, optimal slat Angle was 135-150. Thirdly, hole diameter is the main factor affecting its sand control effect for porous sand barrier; (Kim and Lee, 2001;Zhang et al, 2015;Chen et al, 2019) explored the influence of the hole size of the porous sand barrier on the wind velocity, indicating the larger the hole size had a higher wind velocity and wind and sand prevention effect was worse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Common types of sand fence design-types include horizontal, upright, holed-plank, griddled, and wind-screened fences (Dong et al, 2007). The aerodynamic properties and sheltering effects of sand fences depend mainly on their geometric design and multiple design factors, including height, length, width, porosity, opening size/shape/distribution, and row numbers and the spacing between rows (Li and Sherman, 2015;Lima et al, 2020;Xin et al, 2021). The sheltering effect of multiple rows of sand fences is commonly considered to be more efficient than that of a single-row sand fence (Fang et al, 2018;Liu et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, early studies indicated that sand fences with sharp edges (e.g., square holes, vertical slits, or horizontal slits) have higher sand-trapping efficiencies than those with round edges (e.g., circular holes) (Richards et al, 1984). Height is another important structural parameter of sand fences and is critical for determining sand trapping efficiency and the magnitude of dune deposition (Lima et al, 2020;Ning et al, 2020;Xin et al, 2021). To trap as many transported particles as possible, fence heights usually exceed the saltation height of the wind-blown sand (Phillips and Willetts, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%