Abstract. Background: Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase domain (TKDHead and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remains a challenging disease despite intensive clinical and translational research (1-3). A subset of head and neck cancer is caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) and represents a biologically distinct entity (4). In the past decades, several treatment strategies have been applied to treat HNSCC, however, survival outcomes have not substantially changed, emphasizing the need for more personalized medicine (5-8). Many efforts have, therefore, been made to identify predictive biomarkers and tailor treatment to the individual patient based on their own genetic and molecular profile.The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a transmembrane cell surface receptor belonging to the human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) family of receptor tyrosine kinases. EGFR overexpression occurs in more than 90% of HNSCCs and has been correlated with poor outcome (9). Robust preclinical evidence underlines the role of EGFR in the development of HNSCC, showing that EGFR activation triggers several downstream signaling pathways that play a crucial role in cancer pathogenesis (3,10,11). In this context, strategies for inhibition of EGFR signaling using monoclonal antibodies and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been investigated intensively in clinical trials. De novo or acquired resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy, however, has led to a modest survival benefit for patients with HNSCC, while up-to-date predictive biomarkers of treatment response remain elusive (8,12,13).In non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), patients with activating mutations in the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) are sensitive to small-molecule EGFR TKIs such as gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib (14-17). Given that mutations in the EGFR TKD may help in the selection of patients for EGFR TKIs or other targeted therapies, the EGFR mutation status in treatment-naïve patients with locally advanced oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) was retrospectively evaluated. In addition, a systematic literature review was undertaken to 23 This article is freely accessible online.