2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/995/1/012021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on the Efficiency of Financial Companies in Malaysia with Data Envelopment Analysis Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also seen that APX, JOH, ECML, MAA, BURSA, ACSM and LPI were fully efficient for all the time period. The results were approximately similar for most of the companies since Siew et al (2017) also found similar results during the time period 2010-2015 where LPI, BURSA, ACSM, APX were reported to be fully efficient.…”
Section: Technical Efficiency and Technical Efficiency Changesupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also seen that APX, JOH, ECML, MAA, BURSA, ACSM and LPI were fully efficient for all the time period. The results were approximately similar for most of the companies since Siew et al (2017) also found similar results during the time period 2010-2015 where LPI, BURSA, ACSM, APX were reported to be fully efficient.…”
Section: Technical Efficiency and Technical Efficiency Changesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…From the dataset of Table 3 it is obvious that the average technical efficiency was 0.935 which means companies were less than 7% inefficient to use their existing resources. On the other hand, Siew et al (2017) found average efficiency score 0.5865 for the financial company of Malaysia. It is also seen that APX, JOH, ECML, MAA, BURSA, ACSM and LPI were fully efficient for all the time period.…”
Section: Technical Efficiency and Technical Efficiency Changementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But the portfolio created was not able to generate a return higher than the average industry return. Lim et al (2014), Tehrani et al (2012), Shabbir and Muhammad (2019) and Siew et al (2017) used liquidity, activity, leverage and profitability ratios to find the efficiency of firms under investigation. The most common ratios used in these studies were current ratio, quick ratio, debt to equity ratio, debt to assets, account receivable turnover, inventory turnover, asset turnover, return on asset, return on equity, return on capital employed, net income, operating profit to sales, net profit margin, price to earnings and price to book.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting portfolio yielded higher risk-adjusted returns when compared to other benchmark portfolios (Lim et al, 2014). Tehrani et al (2012) and Siew et al (2017) were able to identify the most efficient companies among a set of companies under investigation. In addition to the above-mentioned ratios Hwang et al (2007) used owners’ equity to fixed assets, times interest earned and achieved a 100% hit rate in classification of stocks for investors used by employing DEA data analysis (DA) approach.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%