2021
DOI: 10.1177/09544089211063712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on surface roughness, tool wear and cutting power in MQL turning of bio-medical Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy with sustainability

Abstract: Ti-6Al-4V ELI (Grade 23) is highly recommended for bio-materials and due to its low thermal conductivity and chemically reactive properties, machinability is poor. Thus the current work emphasized on the selection of appropriate cooling technique and optimal cutting parameters for machining of Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy with sustainability analysis for surface roughness, flank wear and cutting power. Initially, the cutting performances under dry, flood and MQL environments are compared and MQL is observed to better p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53 According to ISO, the allowable amount of surface roughness is less than 1.6 μm. 54 Because the depth of cut remained less than the tool's nose radius and the flank wear standards were set at less than 0.2 mm. The flank wear occurred at the nose corner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…53 According to ISO, the allowable amount of surface roughness is less than 1.6 μm. 54 Because the depth of cut remained less than the tool's nose radius and the flank wear standards were set at less than 0.2 mm. The flank wear occurred at the nose corner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of the established mathematical model is justified through adjusted R-squared, R-squared, and predicted R-squared and good precision values [33]. The confidence level fixed to investigate the predicted model is a 95% level of significance [34]. Regarding actual parameters, the equation [35] for GRG based on response surface methodology is given as Eq.…”
Section: Regression Modelling Of Grgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shukla et al (2023) noticed reductions in machined surface roughness and cutting force by 9.6% and 7.15%, respectively, under MQL machining of steel grade 304 as compared to dry turning. Rajan et al (2022) experienced significant 40% and 157.33% lesser tool wear under the MQL regime, respectively, as compared to flood and dry situations during the turning of Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy. Özbek et al (2022) also observed that the eco-friendly MQL technique results in notable machining performance in terms of surface roughness, tool wear, cutting tool vibration amplitude and cutting temperature when compared with a dry environment during the turning of a high-strength Vanadis 10 tool steel alloy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%