2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.08.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on surface roughness, residual stress and fatigue property of milling in-situ TiB2/7050Al metal matrix composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two main points discussed by the authors were that (a) surface compressive residual stresses decreased by 81 MPa as the feed rate increased from 0.02 to 0.1 mm/rev as a larger removal rate raises the temperature to induce tensile stress, and that (b) surface tensile residual stress increased with an increase in cutting speed due to the high heat generated during milling at higher cutting speeds. The cutting speed effect was similarly observed by Xiong et al [ 19 ]. Lin et al [ 20 ] analyzed the effect of tool nose radius and tool wear on the residual stress distribution during turning of 7075 matrix reinforced with TiB 2 particles.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Two main points discussed by the authors were that (a) surface compressive residual stresses decreased by 81 MPa as the feed rate increased from 0.02 to 0.1 mm/rev as a larger removal rate raises the temperature to induce tensile stress, and that (b) surface tensile residual stress increased with an increase in cutting speed due to the high heat generated during milling at higher cutting speeds. The cutting speed effect was similarly observed by Xiong et al [ 19 ]. Lin et al [ 20 ] analyzed the effect of tool nose radius and tool wear on the residual stress distribution during turning of 7075 matrix reinforced with TiB 2 particles.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…It was also possible to identify that the surface finish at this speed does not show any discrepancy along its surface ( Figure 13). A better finish is expected with higher speeds, this result was also obtained by Xiong et al (2020). According to the literature, the roughness in the front milling can be calculated by Equation 2, where re is the tool tip radius and fz is the feed.…”
Section: Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The deposition rate with this process for aluminum and steel is from 1 kg/h to 4 kg/h, however it is possible to achieve rates above 10 kg/h, but the dimensional accuracy is low (Williams et al 2016). As a disadvantage, there is the residual stress inserted in the part due to the shrinkage during cooling, which is greater along the direction of position (Liu et al 2020). Distortions in dimensions result in poor tolerance quality while residual stress affects part performance (Colegrove et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After milling process, the surface roughness was measured with the white light interferometer (MFT-5000). According to Xiong [32], 2D surface roughness value (Ra & Rq) was not only affected by the measurement location, but also impacted by the measurement direction. In addition, the 2D roughness value would differ a lot with sampling line crossing and not crossing groove, material smearing, cutting edge mark and protuberance defects.…”
Section: Characterization Of Hsd Milling Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%