2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.01.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on nanotube-metal contacts under different contact types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sensible modeling of a practical electron-transport device must meet the following requirements: (1) good contact with metallic electrodes; (2) three major factors to determine the electronic transparency of contacts, that is, favorable interface geometry and bonding, the electronic density of states, and the potential barrier at the interface; and (3) the top contact with electrode (because contacting a single layer from side of electrodes is insufficient for good electron injection). We note that Guo and coworkers have investigated different metals as contact with monolayer BP for future device application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sensible modeling of a practical electron-transport device must meet the following requirements: (1) good contact with metallic electrodes; (2) three major factors to determine the electronic transparency of contacts, that is, favorable interface geometry and bonding, the electronic density of states, and the potential barrier at the interface; and (3) the top contact with electrode (because contacting a single layer from side of electrodes is insufficient for good electron injection). We note that Guo and coworkers have investigated different metals as contact with monolayer BP for future device application.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%