2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/6626062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on Methods of Determining the Grouting Quality of Embedded Rock Bolts Using High Frequency Guided Waves

Abstract: Two experiments, with differing equipment setups, were used to test rock bolts, with differing structures and grouting qualities, using low frequency (20–200 kHz) and high frequency (700 kHz-3 MHz) guided waves to determine the effect of grouting quality on the propagating velocity of the guided waves. The results indicate that grouting quality has a significant effect on the velocity at which waves of low frequencies propagate through embedded rock bolts. As guided wave frequency increases, the sensitivity of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the surrounding rock boundaries are finite, the impedance at these boundaries causes stress waves reaching the boundaries to reflect. The lateral dimensions of the surrounding rock have an impact on the test results [9,25]. In such cases, the stress waves propagating in the anchorage system are similar to pile foundations, and under the influence of size effects, the peak of the bottom reflection signal is reduced, making it difficult to identify response peak at the defect [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the surrounding rock boundaries are finite, the impedance at these boundaries causes stress waves reaching the boundaries to reflect. The lateral dimensions of the surrounding rock have an impact on the test results [9,25]. In such cases, the stress waves propagating in the anchorage system are similar to pile foundations, and under the influence of size effects, the peak of the bottom reflection signal is reduced, making it difficult to identify response peak at the defect [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%