2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on methods for dealing with pile-up errors in evaluating the mechanical properties of thin metal films at sub-micron scale on hard substrates by nanoindentation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their work the effects of film thickness and substrate deformation restraint on the mechanical properties of the electron beam deposited Au and Ag films were examined by using a Berkovich indenter. To examine the residual impression in Au and Al thin films SEM and AFM were used by Zhou et al [27]. They also applied a quantitative approach to deal with the problems with estimating the real contact area, which was developed by Saha and Nix [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In their work the effects of film thickness and substrate deformation restraint on the mechanical properties of the electron beam deposited Au and Ag films were examined by using a Berkovich indenter. To examine the residual impression in Au and Al thin films SEM and AFM were used by Zhou et al [27]. They also applied a quantitative approach to deal with the problems with estimating the real contact area, which was developed by Saha and Nix [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic assumption of this method is that the Young's modulus is independent of the contact area and the contact depth. The hardness can be determined from a measurement of both the load, P and the contact stiffness, S. Zhou et al [27] as well as Saha and Nix [28] used a Berkovich indenter in their experiments. Finally, the large review of experimental techniques for the examination of residual imprints was presented in [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the hardness, H, defined as the load on the indenter normalized with the projected contact area of the hardness impression (see Figure 21), should be independent of the depth of penetration, h. However, over the past 60 years, it was observed that there were significant variations of hardness with respect to penetration depth, especially when the depths decreased to less than a few micro-meters [54][55][56][57][58][59][60]. In addition, two types of indentation size effects have been reported.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Size Effect Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is the normal ISE (the tip is pyramidal or conical)-the hardness increases with decreasing penetration depths, according to the expression "smaller is stronger" (see Figure 21). Another one is the reverse ISE (the tip is spherical) [55,56,61], which displayed that the hardness decreases with increasing depths. However, for the reverse ISE, it was observed that the hardness also increases with the decreasing of tip radius.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Size Effect Of Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation