2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation on failure behavior of collapse column in China’s coal mine based on discontinuous deformation numerical method

Abstract: Karst collapse column is a serious geological disaster in China’s coal mines. There are various karst collapse columns in coal mine areas, such as Huainan, Huaibei, Xingtai, Lu’an. And they have seriously affected mining safety and geological environment. The present research is focused on analyzing subsidence mechanism and dynamic collapse process. Based on mechanical analysis of thin plate theory, a detailed model of collapse column slipping and bending fracture is constructed to gather the critical conditio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This structure can penetrate through the Ordovician tuff, mudstone, and coal layers [21]. When the pressurized water pressure within the Ordovician aquifer is greater than the principal stress of the key layer, the destruction of the column within the surrounding high permeability region will occur [22][23][24]. At this stage, many scholars mainly use series of sudden water models, and the lithological distribution perspective to precisely analyze the sudden water mechanism.…”
Section: Variable Mass Sudden Water Model With Fluid-solid Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This structure can penetrate through the Ordovician tuff, mudstone, and coal layers [21]. When the pressurized water pressure within the Ordovician aquifer is greater than the principal stress of the key layer, the destruction of the column within the surrounding high permeability region will occur [22][23][24]. At this stage, many scholars mainly use series of sudden water models, and the lithological distribution perspective to precisely analyze the sudden water mechanism.…”
Section: Variable Mass Sudden Water Model With Fluid-solid Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Using a finite element mesh, the model geometry is discretized into a series of MREVs, and the hydromechanical parameters and microcrack parameters for each of the MREVs are initialized (ii) The loading condition of the model is discretized into several small subload steps in the time domain, and the model is loaded sequentially by subload (iii) During each subload step, all hydromechanical parameters of the rock are constant, and a finite element method based on the full coupling analysis is adopted to calculate the average stress field, average pore pressure field, average strain field, and average seepage velocity field for each MREV of the model (iv) According to the stress state of each MREV of the rock obtained by finite element calculation, the 5 Geofluids stress intensity factor at the microcrack tip of each group in each MREV is calculated by Equation (11), and the propagation length of each microcrack is calculated (v) Equations (7), (14), and (15) The above implementation procedure is programmed using a combination of MATLAB and COMSOL software to replicate the dynamic processes of damage and fracture as well as the seepage evolution behavior of the rock under hydromechanical coupling. This program enables more realistic and visual numerical simulations of the process and mechanism of groundwater inrush from KCPs in coal seam floors.…”
Section: Numerical Implementation Of the Ssd Coupling Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al [13] studied groundwater inrush disasters caused by seepage instabilities in KCPs. Zuo et al [14,15] studied the failure behavior of KCPs using a discrete element method. Ma et al [16] investigated the particle erosion effect on the groundwater inrush mechanism of a KCP by using FLAC 3D software and a stress-seepage coupling model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early stage, scholars studied the morphological characteristics and pointed out that the cross-sectional morphology was mainly round, oval, and triangular [7][8][9]. It is usually cylindrical or conical in profile and in serrated contact with the surrounding rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%